Literature DB >> 17084518

Therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction after 6 months of treatment with tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil: results from the erectile dysfunction observational study (EDOS).

Antonio Martin-Morales1, Josep Maria Haro, Anthony Beardsworth, Jordan Bertsch, Stathis Kontodimas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This observational study was conducted across Europe to assess health outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who took tadalafil, sildenafil citrate (sildenafil), or vardenafil HCl (vardenafil) for 6 mo.
METHODS: Therapy effectiveness and patient satisfaction were evaluated using established and new questions on erectile function. Behavioural, psychological, and relationship outcomes were assessed using the short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (SF-PAIRS).
RESULTS: In nine European countries at 904 sites, 8047 patients were enrolled and 94% (7560) selected either tadalafil (5315), sildenafil (1252), or vardenafil (993) for treatment at baseline. Of the 7560, 3998 (52.9%) took the same drug for 6 mo. Baseline characteristics across the three treatment groups were comparable: mean age approximately 56 yr, moderate or severe ED, and mean International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score about 13. Tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil were therapeutically effective and improved patient satisfaction in the 40-58% of men who completed 6 mo of a single therapy. Patients taking tadalafil consistently had numerically higher levels of therapeutic effectiveness and satisfaction compared with patients who took sildenafil or vardenafil. The three cohorts had statistically significant changes from baseline in response to SF-PAIRS and there were significant differences, in favour of tadalafil, among cohorts in the Time Concerns domain.
CONCLUSION: In a large observational study that mimics a routine clinical setting, most patients selected an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 to treat ED, which resulted in a high level of therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17084518     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  7 in total

Review 1.  Daily dosing of PDE5 inhibitors: where does it fit in?

Authors:  King Chien Joe Lee; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Assessment of erectile and ejaculatory function after penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Jang Ho Bae; Phil Hyun Song; Hyun Tae Kim; Ki Hak Moon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

3.  Patterns of treatment with PDE5 inhibitors in the clinical practice in Italy: longitudinal data from the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study.

Authors:  Ferdinando Fusco; Riccardo Sicuteri; Andrea Rossi; Stathis Kontodimas; Jose Maria Haro; Ciro Imbimbo; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Tadalafil for prevention of erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [0831] randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Thomas M Pisansky; Stephanie L Pugh; Richard E Greenberg; Nadeem Pervez; Daniel R Reed; Seth A Rosenthal; Rex B Mowat; Adam Raben; Mark K Buyyounouski; Lisa A Kachnic; Deborah W Bruner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  A comparison of the available phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a focus on avanafil.

Authors:  Jeffery D Evans; Stephen R Hill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Degree of Planning of Sexual Intercourse Among Men From China, Japan, and Taiwan Taking Medication for Erectile Dysfunction: Findings of an Observational, Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Bang-Ping Jiann; Koichi Nakajima; Sonali Dighe; Chad D Harshman-Smith; Tarek A Hassan
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.491

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.