M Abdel-Fattah1, I Ramsay, S Pringle. 1. Urogynaecology Unit, South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK. mohamed.abdelfattah@sgh.scot.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the rate of, and risk factors for, lower urinary tract (LUT) injuries associated with the transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TOT) procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology centre. POPULATION: 390 women who underwent transobturator suburethral tapes for management of urodynamic stress incontinence between July 2002 and January 2006. METHODS: Early cases were identified from theatre records and a case note review performed. From May 2005 (n = 94), data from an ongoing prospective audit were reviewed. Data for LUT injuries with TOT procedures were examined and routes of insertion were compared using Fischer's exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of LUT injuries associated with the TOT procedures. Assessment of factors increasing risk of LUT injury, and comparison of the 'outside-in' and 'inside-out' techniques. RESULTS: 241 women underwent TOT outside-in technique and 148 of them underwent inside-out technique. Four LUT injuries occurred (1%): two urethral injuries (0.5%) and two bladder injuries (0.5%). All LUT injuries occurred in the outside-in group, although this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.146). Bladder injuries occurred in women who underwent concomitant vaginal surgery, while urethral injuries occurred in women undergoing secondary procedures. CONCLUSION: LUT injury is an uncommon complication of the TOT procedures, and in our hands only occurred with the outside-in technique. Intraoperative cystoscopy should be considered only in selected cases.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the rate of, and risk factors for, lower urinary tract (LUT) injuries associated with the transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TOT) procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology centre. POPULATION: 390 women who underwent transobturator suburethral tapes for management of urodynamic stress incontinence between July 2002 and January 2006. METHODS: Early cases were identified from theatre records and a case note review performed. From May 2005 (n = 94), data from an ongoing prospective audit were reviewed. Data for LUT injuries with TOT procedures were examined and routes of insertion were compared using Fischer's exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of LUT injuries associated with the TOT procedures. Assessment of factors increasing risk of LUT injury, and comparison of the 'outside-in' and 'inside-out' techniques. RESULTS: 241 women underwent TOT outside-in technique and 148 of them underwent inside-out technique. Four LUT injuries occurred (1%): two urethral injuries (0.5%) and two bladder injuries (0.5%). All LUT injuries occurred in the outside-in group, although this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.146). Bladder injuries occurred in women who underwent concomitant vaginal surgery, while urethral injuries occurred in women undergoing secondary procedures. CONCLUSION:LUT injury is an uncommon complication of the TOT procedures, and in our hands only occurred with the outside-in technique. Intraoperative cystoscopy should be considered only in selected cases.
Authors: Gert Naumann; Thomas Hagemeier; Stefan Zachmann; Aktham Al-Ani; Stefan Albrich; Christine Skala; Rosa Laterza; Misti Linaberry; Heinz Koelbl Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-06-16 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Ahmed S El-Hefnawy; Bassem S Wadie; Mohsen El Mekresh; Adel Nabeeh; Mahmoud A Bazeed Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Halina M Zyczynski; Larry T Sirls; W Jerod Greer; David D Rahn; Elizabeth Casiano; Peggy Norton; Hae-Young Kim; Linda Brubaker Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-12-28 Impact factor: 8.661