| Literature DB >> 17082757 |
A Keppler1, N Gretz, R Schmidt, H-M Kloetzer, H-J Groene, B Lelongt, M Meyer, M Sadick, J Pill.
Abstract
The use of the colorimetric Jaffé method for the measurement of creatinine in mouse and rat plasma has been criticized as prior studies have shown a dramatic overestimation. We compared a colorimetric picric acid, an enzymatic, and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method to assess their appropriateness for routine measurements of creatinine in plasma of healthy and diseased mice (n=61) and rats (n=56). For the colorimetric Jaffé method a pronounced overestimation is confirmed. Additionally the method showed interference with hemoglobin already in a very low, non-visible concentration range in rat plasma. The enzymatic measurement demonstrated a hemoglobin interference in mice, only when hemolysis was visible. The comparison between HPLC and the enzymatic measurement gave a good agreement between both methods in both species. Therefore the enzymatic method fulfills the requirements for a routine screening test for plasma creatinine in healthy as well as diseased mice and rats Kiover a broad concentration range.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17082757 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612