Literature DB >> 17082691

MRI-based PSA density and PSA density of the transitional zone compared with PSA alone: correlation with prostate cancer Gleason score.

Anno Graser1, Andreas F Heuck, Bernhard Sommer, Joerg Massmann, Maximilian F Reiser, Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The tumor Gleason score is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PCA). This retrospective study analyzes whether serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based PSA density of the entire prostate (PSAD) or the prostatic transitional zone (PSAT) distinguishes between PCA of Gleason scores 6 or lower (G6-) and 7 or higher (G7+).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total prostate and transitional zone volumes were planimetrically determined in axial, T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) MRI images of the prostate in 61 patients with previously untreated PCA. Automated standardized microparticle enzyme immuno-assay (EIAs) measured PSA.
RESULTS: Thirty patients had G6- and 31 patients had G7+. PSA values ranged from 1.0 to 57.2 ng/mL. Assignment to G6- or G7+, respectively, was correct in 49 of 61 (80%) cases (odds ratio [OR], 17.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-61.5) for PSA above the optimal cutoff level of 10.35 ng/mL, 48 cases (79%; OR, 13.7; 95% CI, 4.0-46.8) for PSAD above the optimal cutoff level of 0.23 ng/mL/cm, and 45 cases (74%; OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.2-21.3) for PSAT above the optimal cutoff level of 0.38 ng/mL/cm (no significant differences, McNemar test).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with biopsy-proven PCA, serum PSA level alone and MRI-based PSAD and PSAT help distinguish between G6- and G7+. PSAD and PSAT do not improve the level of confidence at which this discrimination is made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17082691     DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000221947.68016.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  1 in total

Review 1.  [Volumetry of metastases from renal cell carcinoma: comparison with the RECIST criteria].

Authors:  A Graser; C R Becker; M F Reiser; C Stief; M Staehler
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.