Literature DB >> 17081766

A biophysical model of atrial fibrillation to define the appropriate ablation pattern in modified maze.

Patrick Ruchat1, Lam Dang, Nathalie Virag, Jürg Schlaepfer, Ludwig Karl von Segesser, Lukas Kappenberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The surgical Maze III procedure remains the gold standard in treating atrial fibrillation (AF); however due to clinical difficulties and higher risks, less invasive ablation alternatives are clinically investigated. The present study aims to define more efficient ablation patterns of the modified maze procedure using a biophysical model of human atria with chronic AF.
METHODS: A three-dimensional model of human atria was developed using both MRI-imaging and a one-layer cellular model reproducing experimentally observed atrial cellular properties. Sustained AF could be induced by a burst-pacing protocol. Ablation lines were implemented in rendering the cardiac cells non-conductive, mimicking transmural lines. Lines were progressively implemented respectively around pulmonary veins (PV), left atrial appendage (LAA), left atrial isthmus (LAI), cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI), and intercaval lines (SIVC) in the computer model, defining the following patterns: P1=PV, P2=P1+LAA, P3=P2+LAI, P4=P3+CTI, P5=P3+SIVC, P6=P5+CTI. Forty simulations were done for each pattern and proportion of sinus rhythm (SR) conversion and time-to-AF termination (TAFT) were assessed.
RESULTS: The most efficient patterns are P5, P6, and Maze III with 100% success. The main difference is expressed in decreasing mean TAFT with a correlation coefficient R=-0.8. There is an inflexion point for 100% success rate at a 7.5s TAFT, meaning that no additional line is mandatory beyond pattern P5.
CONCLUSIONS: Our biophysical model suggests that Maze III could be simplified in his right atrial pattern to a single line joining both vena cavae. This has to be confirmed in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17081766     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  12 in total

Review 1.  Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology.

Authors:  Olaf Dössel; Martin W Krueger; Frank M Weber; Mathias Wilhelms; Gunnar Seemann
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Lessons from computer simulations of ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Computational modeling: What does it tell us about atrial fibrillation therapy?

Authors:  Eleonora Grandi; Dobromir Dobrev; Jordi Heijman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  Mathematical approaches to understanding and imaging atrial fibrillation: significance for mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  How computer simulations of the human heart can improve anti-arrhythmia therapy.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Kelly C Chang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Potential Maintenance Mechanism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Subject to Different Treatment Procedures: A Preliminary Study Based on a Human Atrial Model.

Authors:  Zhao-Lian Ouyang; Li-Ping Sun; Hui Chi; Ling Xia; Ying-Lan Gong; Yu-Bo Fan
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 7.  Anti-arrhythmic strategies for atrial fibrillation: The role of computational modeling in discovery, development, and optimization.

Authors:  Eleonora Grandi; Mary M Maleckar
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Personalized Imaging and Modeling Strategies for Arrhythmia Prevention and Therapy.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Patrick M Boyle; Plamen P Nikolov
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03

Review 9.  Computational models in cardiology.

Authors:  Steven A Niederer; Joost Lumens; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Computational cardiology: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.