OBJECTIVE: To determine whether success rates were similar in Asian and Caucasian women undergoing infertility treatment. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis and multivariate modeling. SETTING: Clinics reporting to the national Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry and a university-based clinic. PATIENT(S): Caucasian and self-identified Asian infertile women undergoing IVF. The study included 25,843 Caucasian and 1,429 Asian patients from the national registry; 370 Caucasian and 197 Asian patients were included from the site-specific clinic. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate and live-birth rate. RESULT(S): Infertile Asian women differed only minimally from their Caucasian counterparts in baseline characteristics and treatment response. Yet Asian women had a decreased clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.80) and a decreased live-birth rate (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.77). Subsequent multivariate analysis demonstrated that Asian ethnicity was an independent predictor of poor outcome. CONCLUSION(S): After treatment, infertile Asian women have significantly fewer pregnancies than do Caucasian women. Multivariate analysis indicates that this discrepancy cannot be accounted for by differences in baseline characteristics or by response to current therapeutic interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether success rates were similar in Asian and Caucasian women undergoing infertility treatment. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis and multivariate modeling. SETTING: Clinics reporting to the national Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry and a university-based clinic. PATIENT(S): Caucasian and self-identified Asian infertilewomen undergoing IVF. The study included 25,843 Caucasian and 1,429 Asian patients from the national registry; 370 Caucasian and 197 Asian patients were included from the site-specific clinic. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate and live-birth rate. RESULT(S): Infertile Asian women differed only minimally from their Caucasian counterparts in baseline characteristics and treatment response. Yet Asian women had a decreased clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.80) and a decreased live-birth rate (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.77). Subsequent multivariate analysis demonstrated that Asian ethnicity was an independent predictor of poor outcome. CONCLUSION(S): After treatment, infertile Asian women have significantly fewer pregnancies than do Caucasian women. Multivariate analysis indicates that this discrepancy cannot be accounted for by differences in baseline characteristics or by response to current therapeutic interventions.
Authors: John M Csokmay; Micah J Hill; Marcy Maguire; Mark D Payson; Victor Y Fujimoto; Alicia Y Armstrong Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Victor Y Fujimoto; Tarun Jain; Ruben Alvero; Lawrence M Nelson; William H Catherino; Moshood Olatinwo; Erica E Marsh; Diana Broomfield; Herman Taylor; Alicia Y Armstrong Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Michael S Bloom; Dongsul Kim; Frederick S Vom Saal; Julia A Taylor; Gloria Cheng; Julie D Lamb; Victor Y Fujimoto Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Sara Crawford; Nikhil Joshi; Sheree L Boulet; Marie A Bailey; Maria-Elena Hood; Susan E Manning; Patricia McKane; Russell S Kirby; Dmitry M Kissin; Denise J Jamieson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Alan H DeCherney; Eric A Widra Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Victor Y Fujimoto; Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Tarun Jain; Alicia Armstrong; David A Grainger; Mark D Hornstein Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Michael S Bloom; Patrick J Parsons; Amy J Steuerwald; Enrique F Schisterman; Richard W Browne; Keewan Kim; Gregory A Coccaro; Giulia C Conti; Natasha Narayan; Victor Y Fujimoto Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 3.143