| Literature DB >> 17081298 |
Kristin M Caspers1, Rebecca Yucuis, Beth Troutman, Ruth Spinks.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attachment theory allows specific predictions about the role of attachment representations in organizing behavior. Insecure attachment is hypothesized to predict maladaptive emotional regulation whereas secure attachment is hypothesized to predict adaptive emotional regulation. In this paper, we test specific hypotheses about the role of attachment representations in substance abuse/dependence and treatment participation. Based on theory, we expect divergence between levels of maladaptive functioning and adaptive methods of regulating negative emotions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17081298 PMCID: PMC1635415 DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ISSN: 1747-597X
Distribution of Inferred Childhood Experiences across Attachment Groups.
| Dismissing | Preoccupied | Earned-secure | Continuous-secure | |||||
| Mother | ||||||||
| Loving | 3.004 | .18 | 2.584 | .36 | 2.594 | .29 | 5.801,2,3 | .15 |
| Rejection | 4.564 | .23 | 5.214 | .45 | 5.294 | .37 | 1.801,2,3 | .19 |
| Involving-Reversing | 1.412 | .20 | 2.851 | .39 | 2.07 | .32 | 1.81 | .16 |
| Pressure-to-Achieve | 1.79 | .20 | 2.45 | .39 | 1.2 | .32 | 1.38 | .16 |
| Neglecting | 1.782 | .18 | 3.541,3,4 | .35 | 2.162,4 | .29 | 1.262,3 | .14 |
| Father | ||||||||
| Loving | 2.814 | .18 | 2.994 | .18 | 2.044 | .29 | 5.511,2,3 | .15 |
| Rejection | 4.623,4 | .23 | 3.753,4 | .46 | 5.861,2,4 | .38 | 2.091,2,3 | .19 |
| Involving-Reversing | 1.252 | .12 | 2.281,4 | .23 | 1.62 | .19 | 1.132 | .09 |
| Pressure-to-Achieve | 1.57 | .16 | 1.87 | .31 | 2.204 | .26 | 1.293 | .13 |
| Neglecting | 3.454 | .28 | 3.674 | .56 | 3.694 | .46 | 2.061,2,3 | .23 |
Note. Superscripts indicate significantly different means across attachment classifications: 1 = Dismissing, 2 = Preoccupied, 3 = Earned-secure, 4 = Continuous-secure.
AAI Attachment Representations and Substance Abuse/Dependence.
| Alcohol Diagnosisa | Marijuana Diagnosis | Non-Marijuana Drug Diagnosis | ||||
| No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
| Organized Attachment | ||||||
| Dismissing (Ds) | 35 (44%) | 44 (56%) | 63 (78%) | 18 (22%) | 66 (82%) | 15 (18%) |
| Preoccupied (E) | 7 (44%) | 9 (56%) | 11 (69%) | 5 (31%) | 9 (56%) | 7 (44%) |
| Earned-secure (ES) | 9 (36%) | 16 (64%) | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) | 20 (80%) | 5 (20%) |
| Continuous-secure (CS) | 48 (56%) | 38 (44%) | 77 (90%) | 9 (10%) | 78 (91%) | 8 (9%) |
| Unresolved/Disoriented | ||||||
| Not-unresolved (Not-U) | 73 (47%) | 81 (53%) | 123 (79%) | 32 (21%) | 130 (84%) | 25 (16%) |
| Unresolved (U) | 18 (46%) | 21 (54%) | 32 (82%) | 7 (18%) | 31 (80%) | 8 (20%) |
Note. Ds = dismissing. E = preoccupied. ES = earned-secure. CS = continuous-secure Sample size of 194 for analyses including unresolved/disoriented attachment classification. Percentages are within substance and rows.
a Diagnoses were missing for two subjects due to incomplete data.
Logistic Regression Predicting Substance Abuse/Dependence from Organized Attachment Contrasts.
| Alcohol Abuse/Dependencea | Marijuana | Non-Marijuana Substance | |||||||
| Attachment Contrasts | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Ds or E or ES versus CS | 1.575 | .058 | 0.984, 2.519 | 2.89 | .001 | 1.504, 5.587 | 2.532 | .006 | 1.304, 4.926 |
| E or ES versus Ds | 0.930 | .787 | 0.549, 1.576 | 0.673 | .176 | 0.379, 1.194 | 0.629 | .133 | 0.344, 1.152 |
| ES versus E | 0.878 | .693 | 0.461, 1.672 | 0.870 | .685 | 0.445, 1.702 | 1.719 | .128 | 0.856, 3.453 |
Note. Ds = dismissing, E = preoccupied, ES = earned-secure, CS = continuous-secure.
a Wald χ2 (3) = 4.303, p = .231. b Wald χ2 (3) = 12.333, p = .006. c Wald χ2 (3) = 10.586, p = .014.
AAI Attachment Representations and Participation in Treatment.
| Spoken to a professional | Outpatient treatment | |||
| No | Yes | No | Yes | |
| Organized Classificationsa | ||||
| Dismissing (Ds) | 47 (58%) | 34 (42%) | 49 (61%) | 32 (39%) |
| Preoccupied (E) | 4 (25%) | 12 (75%) | 6 (38%) | 10 (62%) |
| Earned-secure (ES) | 5 (20%) | 20 (80%) | 10 (40%) | 15 (60%) |
| Continuous-secure (CS) | 48 (56%) | 38 (44%) | 64 (74%) | 22 (22%) |
| Unresolved/Disorientedb | ||||
| Not-unresolved (Not-U) | 76 (49%) | 79 (51%) | 91 (59%) | 64 (41%) |
| Unresolved (U) | 19 (49%) | 20 (51%) | 27 (69%) | 12 (31%) |
Note. Ds = dismissing, E = preoccupied, ES = earned-secure, CS = continuous-secure. Not-U = not unresolved. U = unresolved.
a n = 208. b n = 194.
Logistic Regression Predicting Treatment Participation from Organized Attachment Contrasts.
| Spoken to a professionala | Outpatient Treatmentb | |||||
| Attachment Contrasts | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| CS or Ds versus E or ES | 4.578 | .001 | 2.039, 10.278 | 3.337 | .001 | 1.618, 6.885 |
| CS versus Ds | 1.046 | .773 | 0.770, 1.420 | 0.726 | .056 | 0.522, 1.740 |
| E versus ES | 0.866 | .706 | 0.410, 1.831 | 1.054 | .873 | 0.553, 2.009 |
Note. Ds = dismissing, E = preoccupied, ES = earned-secure, CS = continuous-secure.
a Wald χ2 (3) = 17.084, p < .001. b Wald χ2 (3) = 14.891, p = .002.
Logistic Regression Predicting Treatment Participation Among Individuals with Substance Abuse/Dependence (n = 75) from Organized Attachment Contrasts.
| Spoken to a professional a | Outpatient Treatment b | |||||
| Attachment Contrast | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Ds versus E or ES | 2.538 | .015 | 1.200, 5.376 | 1.779 | .090 | 0.913, 3.472 |
Note. Ds = dismissing, E = preoccupied, ES = earned-secure.
a Wald χ2 (1) = 6.772, p < .009. b Wald χ2 (1) = 2.995, p = .084.