Literature DB >> 17080926

Sample size calculations for clinical studies allowing for uncertainty about the variance.

Steven A Julious1, Roger J Owen.   

Abstract

One of the most important steps in the design of a pharmaceutical clinical trial is the estimation of the sample size. For a superiority trial the sample size formula (to achieve a stated power) would be based on a given clinically meaningful difference and a value for the population variance. The formula is typically used as though this population variance is known whereas in reality it is unknown and is replaced by an estimate with its associated uncertainty. The variance estimate would be derived from an earlier similarly designed study (or an overall estimate from several previous studies) and its precision would depend on its degrees of freedom. This paper provides a solution for the calculation of sample sizes that allows for the imprecision in the estimate of the sample variance and shows how traditional formulae give sample sizes that are too small since they do not allow for this uncertainty with the deficiency being more acute with fewer degrees of freedom. It is recommended that the methodology described in this paper should be used when the sample variance has less than 200 degrees of freedom.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080926     DOI: 10.1002/pst.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  12 in total

1.  Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Nicholas Latimer; Elizabeth Cross; Marian Brady; Pam Enderby; Audrey Bowen; Steven Julious; Madeleine Harrison; Abualbishr Alshreef; Ellen Bradley; Arjun Bhadhuri; Tim Chater; Helen Hughes; Helen Witts; Esther Herbert; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Power for studies with random group sizes.

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Jonathan D Mahnken
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Design of the value of imaging in enhancing the wellness of your heart (VIEW) trial and the impact of uncertainty on power.

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Tamar S Polonsky; Philip Greenland; David C Goff; Letitia H Perdue; Stephen P Fortmann; Karen L Margolis; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Feasibility Outcomes of a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial to Increase Cruciferous and Green Leafy Vegetable Intake in Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Sylvia L Crowder; Andrew D Frugé; Katherine G Douglas; Yi Tang Chen; Laura Moody; Ashley Delk-Licata; John W Erdman; Molly Black; William R Carroll; Sharon A Spencer; Julie L Locher; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Laura Q Rogers; Anna E Arthur
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elsa Tavernier; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable.

Authors:  Amy L Whitehead; Steven A Julious; Cindy L Cooper; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Sample size calculation in multi-centre clinical trials.

Authors:  Markus Harden; Tim Friede
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Cindy Cooper; Pam Enderby; Marian Brady; Audrey Bowen; Nicholas Latimer; Steven Julious; Elizabeth Cross; Abualbishr Alshreef; Madeleine Harrison; Ellen Bradley; Helen Witts; Tim Chater
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Propylene mesh versus acrylic resin stent for palatal wound protection following free gingival graft harvesting: a short-term pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nermin Yussif; Rasha Wagih; Khaled Selim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Preoperative contingency management intervention for smoking abstinence in cancer patients: trial protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alana M Rojewski; Lisa M Fucito; Nathaniel L Baker; Amanda M Palmer; Madeline G Foster; Graham W Warren; Steven L Bernstein; Benjamin A Toll
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.