Literature DB >> 17080512

Resistance and cross-resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata.

Andrei Alyokhin1, Galen Dively, Megan Patterson, Christopher Castaldo, David Rogers, Matthew Mahoney, John Wollam.   

Abstract

One of the major challenges in managing the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) is its remarkable ability to develop resistance to virtually every insecticide that has ever been used against it. Resistance is particularly common throughout northeastern USA as far north as Maine. The first instances of resistance to imidacloprid have already been reported from several locations in New York, Delaware and southern Maine. Rotating insecticides with different modes of action may delay insecticide resistance, but successful implementation of this technique depends on a good understanding of resistance and cross-resistance patterns in populations of target pests. LC(50) values were measured for imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in Colorado potato beetle populations from a variety of locations in the USA and Canada using diet incorporation bioassays. The field performance of imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin against imidacloprid-resistant beetles on a commercial potato farm in southern Maine was also evaluated. Correlation between LC(50) values for imidacloprid and thiamethoxam was highly significant, even when populations previously exposed to thiamethoxam were excluded from the analysis. There was no statistically detectable difference in the LC(50) values between populations exposed to both insecticides and to imidacloprid alone. Applications of neonicotinoid insecticides at planting delayed build-up of imidacloprid-resistant beetle populations on field plots by 1-2 weeks but failed to provide adequate crop protection. Consistently with bioassay results, there was also substantial cross-resistance among the three tested neonicotinoid insecticides. Results of the present study support the recommendation to avoid rotating imidacloprid with thiamethoxam as a part of a resistance management plan. Copyright (c) 2006 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17080512     DOI: 10.1002/ps.1305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  16 in total

1.  Cross-resistance, stability, and fitness cost of resistance to imidacloprid in Musca domestica L., (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Naeem Abbas; Hussnain Khan; Sarfraz Ali Shad
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Honeybee dietary neonicotinoid exposure is associated with pollen collection from agricultural weeds.

Authors:  T J Wood; I Kaplan; Y Zhang; Z Szendrei
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neurological alterations induced by formulated imidacloprid toxicity in Japanese quails.

Authors:  Sayed M Rawi; Ayed S Al-Logmani; Reham Z Hamza
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.584

4.  RNA interference in Colorado potato beetle: steps toward development of dsRNA as a commercial insecticide.

Authors:  Subba Reddy Palli
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.186

5.  Spatial and Temporal Potato Intensification Drives Insecticide Resistance in the Specialist Herbivore, Leptinotarsa decemlineata.

Authors:  Anders S Huseth; Jessica D Petersen; Katja Poveda; Zsofia Szendrei; Brian A Nault; George G Kennedy; Russell L Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites.

Authors:  N Simon-Delso; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; M Chagnon; C Downs; L Furlan; D W Gibbons; C Giorio; V Girolami; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C H Krupke; M Liess; E Long; M McField; P Mineau; E A D Mitchell; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; L Pisa; J Settele; J D Stark; A Tapparo; H Van Dyck; J Van Praagh; J P Van der Sluijs; P R Whitehorn; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Laboratory Evaluation of Isaria fumosorosea CCM 8367 and Steinernema feltiae Ustinov against Immature Stages of the Colorado Potato Beetle.

Authors:  Hany M Hussein; Oxana Skoková Habuštová; Vladimír Půža; Rostislav Zemek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A specialist herbivore pest adaptation to xenobiotics through up-regulation of multiple Cytochrome P450s.

Authors:  Fang Zhu; Timothy W Moural; David R Nelson; Subba R Palli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Efficient production of long double-stranded RNAs applicable to agricultural pest control by Corynebacterium glutamicum equipped with coliphage T7-expression system.

Authors:  Shuhei Hashiro; Yasuhiko Chikami; Haruka Kawaguchi; Alexander A Krylov; Teruyuki Niimi; Hisashi Yasueda
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  The Differential Effect of Low-Dose Mixtures of Four Pesticides on the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors:  Emiliane Taillebois; Steeve H Thany
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.