Literature DB >> 17080342

[Current treatment of hamate hook fractures].

O Scheufler1, S Radmer, D Erdmann, K Exner, G Germann, R Andresen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hamate hook fractures can be treated conservatively or surgically, whereby fragment and fracture position, age of the fracture, associated injuries, and individual needs of the patient all influence the choice of the therapeutic procedure. Acute non-displaced fractures are frequently treated conservatively, while displaced fractures and nonunions undergo surgical treatment. We report our experience in diagnostic and therapeutic management of 14 hamate hook fractures. CLINICAL MATERIAL AND
METHOD: During a three-year period, 14 patients (eleven men and three women) 21 to 73 years old (42.0 +/- 17.9 years) with fractures at the base of the hamate hook were treated at three hand surgery units. The retrospective study of all patients included a chart review, postoperative radiological imaging after one year, and clinical examinations with grip strength measurements after 18 to 34 months (27.8 +/- 4.9 months). In six patients (43 %), the acute fracture was immobilized in a lower arm cast for six weeks, while eight patients (57 %) were operated primarily. In five cases (36 %) excision of the fragment and in three cases (21 %) open reduction and internal fixation using a screw were performed. Of six patients treated conservatively, five developed nonunion after two to five months (3.0 +/- 1.2 months) with persistent pain and underwent secondary surgery. One patient was asymptomatic despite a nonunion and declined surgical treatment. In three cases the fragment was excised, while two patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a screw.
RESULTS: All patients operated primarily were free of complaints three months after surgery. The success rate of surgical treatment (8/8) was therefore significantly higher than that after conservative treatment (1/6).
CONCLUSION: Compared to conservative treatment of acute non-displaced hamate hook fractures, which is associated with a high risk of developing symptomatic nonunion, primary surgical treatment reliably yields a good clinical outcome. Here, results after fragment excision and open reduction and internal fixation are comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080342     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir        ISSN: 0722-1819            Impact factor:   1.018


  6 in total

1.  Persistent wrist pain in a mature golfer.

Authors:  William O'Grady; Charles Hazle
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  [Ulnar-sided wrist pain in sports: TFCC lesions and fractures of the hook of the hamate bone as uncommon diagnosis].

Authors:  M M Plöger; K Kabir; M J Friedrich; K Welle; C Burger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Minimal Invasive Fixation of Hamate Hook Fractures Through a Dorsal Percutaneous Approach Using a Mini Compression Screw: An Experimental Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Oliver Scheufler; Sebastian Radmer; Gottfried Bogusch; Reimer Andresen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Concomitant hook of hamate fractures in patients with scaphoid fracture: more common than you might think.

Authors:  Ramin Mandegaran; Sam Gidwani; Ali Zavareh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Excision of Hook of Hamate Fractures in Elite Baseball Players: Surgical Technique and Return to Play.

Authors:  Ian D Engler; Gustavo Barrazueta; Nicholas D Colacchio; David E Ruchelsman; Mark R Belsky; Matthew D Leibman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  Hamulus Stress Fracture in a Batsman: An Unusual Injury in Cricket - A Case report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  M S Dhillon; Rakesh John; Himmat Dhillon; Sidak Dhillon; Sharad Prabhakar
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.