INTRODUCTION: Carboxyamido-triazole (CAI) is a synthetic inhibitor of non-voltage-gated calcium channels that reversibly inhibits angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, and metastatic potential. This study examined the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of oral CAI in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in an open-label, single arm non-randomized phase 2 trial. METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed GBM started CAI therapy (250 mg daily) on the first day of radiation (6000 cGy in 30 fractions) and continued until progression, unless side effects became intolerable. The primary outcome was survival compared to historical controls within the NABTT CNS Consortium database. Secondary outcomes included toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled with a median Karnofsky performance status of 90 and age of 56 years. Forty-six (84%) of these patients had debulking surgeries and 52 have died. The median survival was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.5-12.8) compared to 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) in the NABTT reference group (p = 0.97). Significant toxicities included 2 incidents of reversible vision loss. The mean CAI plasma concentration for patients taking enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) was 1.35 +/-1.22 compared to 4.06 +/- 1.50 (p < 0.001) for subjects not taking these agents. Overall survival and grade > or = 3 toxicities were comparable by EIAED status. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that (1) CAI can be administered safely with concomitant cranial irradiation, (2) the pharmacokinetics of CAI are significantly affected by co-administration of EIAED, and (3) the survival of patients with newly diagnosed GBM was not improved with this novel agent, despite achieving adequate drug levels.
INTRODUCTION:Carboxyamido-triazole (CAI) is a synthetic inhibitor of non-voltage-gated calcium channels that reversibly inhibits angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, and metastatic potential. This study examined the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of oral CAI in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in an open-label, single arm non-randomized phase 2 trial. METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed GBM started CAI therapy (250 mg daily) on the first day of radiation (6000 cGy in 30 fractions) and continued until progression, unless side effects became intolerable. The primary outcome was survival compared to historical controls within the NABTT CNS Consortium database. Secondary outcomes included toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled with a median Karnofsky performance status of 90 and age of 56 years. Forty-six (84%) of these patients had debulking surgeries and 52 have died. The median survival was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.5-12.8) compared to 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) in the NABTT reference group (p = 0.97). Significant toxicities included 2 incidents of reversible vision loss. The mean CAI plasma concentration for patients taking enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) was 1.35 +/-1.22 compared to 4.06 +/- 1.50 (p < 0.001) for subjects not taking these agents. Overall survival and grade > or = 3 toxicities were comparable by EIAED status. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that (1) CAI can be administered safely with concomitant cranial irradiation, (2) the pharmacokinetics of CAI are significantly affected by co-administration of EIAED, and (3) the survival of patients with newly diagnosed GBM was not improved with this novel agent, despite achieving adequate drug levels.
Authors: D H Gorski; H J Mauceri; R M Salloum; S Gately; S Hellman; M A Beckett; V P Sukhatme; G A Soff; D W Kufe; R R Weichselbaum Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: E C Kohn; W D Figg; G A Sarosy; K S Bauer; P A Davis; M J Soltis; A Thompkins; L A Liotta; E Reed Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Steven Brem; Stuart A Grossman; Kathryn A Carson; Pamela New; Surasak Phuphanich; Jane B Alavi; Tom Mikkelsen; Joy D Fisher Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: H J Mauceri; N N Hanna; M A Beckett; D H Gorski; M J Staba; K A Stellato; K Bigelow; R Heimann; S Gately; M Dhanabal; G A Soff; V P Sukhatme; D W Kufe; R R Weichselbaum Journal: Nature Date: 1998-07-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: John J Laterra; Stuart A Grossman; Kathryn A Carson; Glenn J Lesser; Fred H Hochberg; Mark R Gilbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: S A Grossman; F Hochberg; J Fisher; T L Chen; L Kim; R Gregory; L B Grochow; S Piantadosi Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1998 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Antonio Omuro; Kathryn Beal; Katharine McNeill; Robert J Young; Alissa Thomas; Xuling Lin; Robert Terziev; Thomas J Kaley; Lisa M DeAngelis; Mariza Daras; Igor T Gavrilovic; Ingo Mellinghoff; Eli L Diamond; Andrew McKeown; Malbora Manne; Andrew Caterfino; Krishna Patel; Linda Bavisotto; Greg Gorman; Michael Lamson; Philip Gutin; Viviane Tabar; Debyani Chakravarty; Timothy A Chan; Cameron W Brennan; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Rashida A Karmali; Elena Pentsova Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stuart A Grossman; Xiaobu Ye; Marc Chamberlain; Tom Mikkelsen; Tracy Batchelor; Serena Desideri; Steven Piantadosi; Joy Fisher; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rachel L Derr; Xiaobu Ye; Melissa U Islas; Serena Desideri; Christopher D Saudek; Stuart A Grossman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Gautier; I Dhennin-Duthille; A S Ay; P Rybarczyk; I Korichneva; H Ouadid-Ahidouch Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 8.739