Literature DB >> 17080026

A cost-effectiveness approach to the qualification and acceptance of biomarkers.

Stephen A Williams1, David E Slavin, John A Wagner, Christopher J Webster.   

Abstract

The flow of new medicines to patients depends on the development of new biomarkers and their correct interpretation, yet there are no widely accepted and practically applicable criteria that facilitate adequate biomarker qualification. As a result, case-by-case qualifications are based on subjective assessments that do not lead to optimal decisions for patients, which have contributed to the 'stagnation' in drug productivity identified by the FDA. An alternative is to qualify biomarkers in terms of cost effectiveness using a set of principles that enable the evaluation of biomarkers even with incomplete knowledge. This approach could minimize harm to patients, improve access to medicines and reduce healthcare costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080026     DOI: 10.1038/nrd2174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov        ISSN: 1474-1776            Impact factor:   84.694


  15 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

2.  Molecular diagnostics. At the nexus of individualized medicine, health care delivery, and public policy.

Authors:  Scott A Waldman; Andre Terzic
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Future prospects for biomarkers of alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced disorders.

Authors:  Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 4.  Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; Richard Frank; Karl Broich; Stefan J Teipel; Russell G Katz; John Hardy; Karl Herholz; Arun L W Bokde; Frank Jessen; Yvonne C Hoessler; Wendy R Sanhai; Henrik Zetterberg; Janet Woodcock; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Peter E Barker; Mahadev Murthy
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2009-11-27

6.  Bridging the gap: moving predictive and prognostic assays from research to clinical use.

Authors:  P Michael Williams; Tracy G Lively; J Milburn Jessup; Barbara A Conley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials.

Authors:  Richard L Schilsky; James H Doroshow; Michael Leblanc; Barbara A Conley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Molecular staging individualizing cancer management.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Where medicine, business, and public policy intersect.

Authors:  Chantell L Wilson; Stephanie Schultz; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2007-02

Review 10.  GUCY2C molecular staging personalizes colorectal cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jian P Gong; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.