RATIONALE: Providing family members with clear, honest, and timely information is a major task for intensive care unit physicians. Time spent informing families has been associated with effectiveness of information but has not been measured in specifically designed studies. OBJECTIVES: To measure time spent informing families of intensive care unit patients. METHODS: One-day cross-sectional study in 90 intensive care units in France. MEASUREMENTS: Clocked time spent by physicians informing the families of each of 951 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit during a 24-hr period. MAIN RESULTS: Median family information time was 16 (interquartile range, 8-30) mins per patient, with 20% of the time spent explaining the diagnosis, 20% on explaining treatments, and 60% on explaining the prognosis. One third of the time was spent listening to family members. Multivariable analysis identified one factor associated with less information time (room with more than one bed) and seven factors associated with more information time, including five patient-related factors (surgery on the study day, higher Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, coma, mechanical ventilation, and worsening clinical status) and two family-related factors (first contact with family and interview with the spouse). Median information time was 20 (interquartile range, 10-39) mins when three factors were present and 106.5 (interquartile range, 103-110) mins when five were present. CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with information time provided by critical care physicians to family members of critically ill patients. Whether information time correlates with communication difficulties or communication skills needs to be evaluated. Information time provided by residents and nurses should be studied.
RATIONALE: Providing family members with clear, honest, and timely information is a major task for intensive care unit physicians. Time spent informing families has been associated with effectiveness of information but has not been measured in specifically designed studies. OBJECTIVES: To measure time spent informing families of intensive care unit patients. METHODS: One-day cross-sectional study in 90 intensive care units in France. MEASUREMENTS: Clocked time spent by physicians informing the families of each of 951 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit during a 24-hr period. MAIN RESULTS: Median family information time was 16 (interquartile range, 8-30) mins per patient, with 20% of the time spent explaining the diagnosis, 20% on explaining treatments, and 60% on explaining the prognosis. One third of the time was spent listening to family members. Multivariable analysis identified one factor associated with less information time (room with more than one bed) and seven factors associated with more information time, including five patient-related factors (surgery on the study day, higher Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, coma, mechanical ventilation, and worsening clinical status) and two family-related factors (first contact with family and interview with the spouse). Median information time was 20 (interquartile range, 10-39) mins when three factors were present and 106.5 (interquartile range, 103-110) mins when five were present. CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with information time provided by critical care physicians to family members of critically illpatients. Whether information time correlates with communication difficulties or communication skills needs to be evaluated. Information time provided by residents and nurses should be studied.
Authors: Robin Cremer; Philippe Hubert; Bruno Grandbastien; Grégoire Moutel; Francis Leclerc Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sabina Hunziker; Wendy McHugh; Barbara Sarnoff-Lee; Sabrina Cannistraro; Long Ngo; Edward Marcantonio; Michael D Howell Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michelle Olding; Sarah E McMillan; Scott Reeves; Madeline H Schmitt; Kathleen Puntillo; Simon Kitto Journal: Health Expect Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Chigozie Jesse Uneke; Abel Ebeh Ezeoha; Henry Chukwuemeka Uro-Chukwu; Chinonyelum Thecla Ezeonu; Jonathan Igboji Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2018-06-01