PURPOSE: Oxidative phosphorylation is under dual genetic control of the nuclear and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Oxidative phosphorylation disorders are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, which makes it difficult to determine the genetic defect, and symptom-based protocols which link clinical symptoms directly to a specific gene or mtDNA mutation are falling short. Moreover, approximately 25% of the pediatric patients with oxidative phosphorylation disorders is estimated to have mutations in the mtDNA and a standard screening approach for common mutations and deletions will only explain part of these cases. Therefore, we tested a new CHIP-based screening method for the mtDNA. METHODS: MitoChip (Affymetrix) resequencing was performed on three test samples and on 28 patient samples. RESULTS: Call rates were 94% on average and heteroplasmy detection levels varied from 5-50%. A genetic diagnosis can be made in almost one-quarter of the patients at a potential output of 8 complete mtDNA sequences every 4 days. Moreover, a number of potentially pathogenic unclassified variants (UV) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of long-range PCR protocols and the predominance of single nucleotide substitutions in the mtDNA make the resequencing CHIP a very fast and reliable method to screen the complete mtDNA for mutations.
PURPOSE: Oxidative phosphorylation is under dual genetic control of the nuclear and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Oxidative phosphorylation disorders are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, which makes it difficult to determine the genetic defect, and symptom-based protocols which link clinical symptoms directly to a specific gene or mtDNA mutation are falling short. Moreover, approximately 25% of the pediatric patients with oxidative phosphorylation disorders is estimated to have mutations in the mtDNA and a standard screening approach for common mutations and deletions will only explain part of these cases. Therefore, we tested a new CHIP-based screening method for the mtDNA. METHODS: MitoChip (Affymetrix) resequencing was performed on three test samples and on 28 patient samples. RESULTS: Call rates were 94% on average and heteroplasmy detection levels varied from 5-50%. A genetic diagnosis can be made in almost one-quarter of the patients at a potential output of 8 complete mtDNA sequences every 4 days. Moreover, a number of potentially pathogenic unclassified variants (UV) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of long-range PCR protocols and the predominance of single nucleotide substitutions in the mtDNA make the resequencing CHIP a very fast and reliable method to screen the complete mtDNA for mutations.
Authors: A M Voets; B J C van den Bosch; A P Stassen; A T Hendrickx; D M Hellebrekers; L Van Laer; E Van Eyken; G Van Camp; A Pyle; S V Baudouin; P F Chinnery; H J M Smeets Journal: Mitochondrion Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Marty C Brandon; Eduardo Ruiz-Pesini; Dan Mishmar; Vincent Procaccio; Marie T Lott; Kevin Cuong Nguyen; Syawal Spolim; Upen Patil; Pierre Baldi; Douglas C Wallace Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Keyanoosh Kassauei; Nils Habbe; Michael E Mullendore; Collins A Karikari; Anirban Maitra; Georg Feldmann Journal: Int J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2006
Authors: Guomei Tang; Puri Gutierrez Rios; Sheng-Han Kuo; Hasan Orhan Akman; Gorazd Rosoklija; Kurenai Tanji; Andrew Dwork; Eric A Schon; Salvatore Dimauro; James Goldman; David Sulzer Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Sergey I Nikolaev; Christian Iseli; Andrew J Sharp; Daniel Robyr; Jacques Rougemont; Corinne Gehrig; Laurent Farinelli; Stylianos E Antonarakis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John P Jakupciak; Andrea Maggrah; Samantha Maragh; Jennifer Maki; Brian Reguly; Katrina Maki; Roy Wittock; Kerry Robinson; Paul D Wagner; Robert E Thayer; Ken Gehman; Teresa Gehman; Sudhir Srivastava; Alioune Ngom; Gabriel D Dakubo; Ryan L Parr Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 4.430