Literature DB >> 17079666

Choosing the lesser of two evils, the better of two goods: specifying the roles of ventromedial prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate in object choice.

Karina Blair1, Abigail A Marsh, John Morton, Meena Vythilingam, Matthew Jones, Krystal Mondillo, Daniel C Pine, Wayne C Drevets, James R Blair.   

Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices (ACd) are considered important for reward-based decision making. However, work distinguishing their individual functional contributions has only begun. One aspect of decision making that has received little attention is that making the right choice often translates to making the better choice. Thus, response choice often occurs in situations where both options are desirable (e.g., choosing between mousse au chocolat or crème caramel cheesecake from a menu) or, alternatively, in situations where both options are undesirable. Moreover, response choice is easier when the reinforcements associated with the objects are far apart, rather than close together, in value. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to delineate the functional roles of the vmPFC and ACd by investigating these two aspects of decision making: (1) decision form (i.e., choosing between two objects to gain the greater reward or the lesser punishment), and (2) between-object reinforcement distance (i.e., the difference in reinforcements associated with the two objects). Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses within the ACd and vmPFC were both related to decision form but differentially. Whereas ACd showed greater responses when deciding between objects to gain the lesser punishment, vmPFC showed greater responses when deciding between objects to gain the greater reward. Moreover, vmPFC was sensitive to reinforcement expectations associated with both the chosen and the forgone choice. In contrast, BOLD responses within ACd, but not vmPFC, related to between-object reinforcement distance, increasing as the distance between the reinforcements of the two objects decreased. These data are interpreted with reference to models of ACd and vmPFC functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079666      PMCID: PMC6674525          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1640-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  66 in total

1.  Dynamic decision making in the brain.

Authors:  John Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Wolfram Schultz; Colin F Camerer; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Taking a different perspective: mindset influences neural regions that represent value and choice.

Authors:  Jamil P Bhanji; Jennifer S Beer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Trait anxiety and dynamic adjustments in conflict processing.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Nina Alexander; Helge Gebhardt; Juergen Hennig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Prefrontal Cortex, Emotion, and Approach/Withdrawal Motivation.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spielberg; Jennifer L Stewart; Rebecca L Levin; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  Disrupted reinforcement signaling in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate in youths with conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder and a high level of psychopathic traits.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Finger; Abigail A Marsh; Karina S Blair; Marguerite E Reid; Courtney Sims; Pamela Ng; Daniel S Pine; R James R Blair
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  GABA levels in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during the viewing of appetitive and disgusting food images.

Authors:  Caterina Padulo; Stefano Delli Pizzi; Laura Bonanni; Richard A E Edden; Antonio Ferretti; Daniele Marzoli; Raffaella Franciotti; Valerio Manippa; Marco Onofrj; Gianna Sepede; Armando Tartaro; Luca Tommasi; Stefano Puglisi-Allegra; Alfredo Brancucci
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Jacqueline Hairston; Madeleine Schrier; Jin Fan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Disrupted expected value and prediction error signaling in youths with disruptive behavior disorders during a passive avoidance task.

Authors:  Stuart F White; Kayla Pope; Stephen Sinclair; Katherine A Fowler; Sarah J Brislin; W Craig Williams; Daniel S Pine; R James R Blair
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; Theresa J Klein; John J B Allen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.