Literature DB >> 1707954

Low-dose ACOP-B and VABE: weekly chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced-stage diffuse large-cell lymphoma.

S E O'Reilly1, P Klimo, J M Connors.   

Abstract

Elderly patients with advanced-stage diffuse large-cell lymphomas (DLCLs) are either excluded from or under-represented in most clinical trials of combination chemotherapy regimens because they tolerate treatment poorly and usually have a worse outcome. We report two brief weekly chemotherapy regimens designed specifically for elderly patients. Eligible patients were aged 65 to 85 years, had advanced-stage DLCL (diffuse mixed, diffuse large-cleaved or noncleaved, immunoblastic, or diffuse large-cell not otherwise specified). Advanced stage was defined as Ann Arbor stage III or IV or stage I or II with a mass greater than 10 cm or B symptoms. Low-dose doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, and prednisone (LD-ACOP-B) accrued 40 patients between March 1983 and September 1985; 65% achieved a complete response (CR), there were two toxic deaths, the actuarial failure-free survival (FFS) is 19%, disease-specific survival (DSS) 30%, and overall survival (OS) 28%, with a maximum follow-up of 6 years. The regimen of etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, and prednisone (VABE) accrued 32 patients between July 1985 and June 1987; 63% achieved a CR, there were two toxic deaths, and the actuarial FFS is 34%, DSS 45%, and OS 36%, with a maximum follow-up of 4 years. There is no difference in FFS, DSS, or OS between these two regimens. VABE caused more myelosuppression and infectious complications, although the toxic death rates were similar. We prefer LD-ACOP-B because follow-up is longer and toxicity is less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1707954     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.5.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. II: Management problems.

Authors:  S E O'Reilly; J M Connors
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-04

2.  Long-term results of a multicenter randomized, comparative trial of modified CHOP versus THP-COP versus THP-COPE regimens in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Mayumi Mori; Kiyoshi Kitamura; Michihiko Masuda; Tomomitsu Hotta; Tamotsu Miyazaki; Akira B Miura; Hideaki Mizoguchi; Akira Shibata; Hidehiko Saito; Tamotsu Matsuda; Toru Masaoka; Mine Harada; Yoshiyuki Niho; Fumimaro Takaku
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Defining treatment aims and end-points in older patients with cancer.

Authors:  C E Desch; T J Smith
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  A risk-benefit assessment of anthracycline antibiotics in antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  R Abraham; R L Basser; M D Green
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Current guidelines for the management of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  M Martelli; V De Sanctis; G Avvisati; F Mandelli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the elderly: a guide to drug treatment.

Authors:  N Niitsu
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  A phase II study of VEPA/FEPP chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma in elderly patients: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9203.

Authors:  Fumi Mizoroki; Yuko Hirose; Masayuki Sano; Haruhiko Fukuda; Kensei Tobinai; Masanobu Nakata; Masafumi Taniwaki; Fumio Kawano; Kimiharu Uozumi; Kenichi Sawada; Shiro Fukuhara; Kaori Nasu; Yoichiro Ohno; Hironobu Toki; Atsushi Togawa; Masahiro Kikuchi; Tomomitsu Hotta; Masanori Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.490

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.