Literature DB >> 1707791

Differences between morning-types and evening-types in the dynamics of EEG slow wave activity during night sleep.

G A Kerkhof1.   

Abstract

During baseline nights in a sleep laboratory electrophysiological sleep records were made for 8 morning-type subjects (M-types) and 8 evening-type subjects (E-types). As compared with the E-types, the M-types were relatively advanced with respect to the times of maximum and minimum rectal temperature and sleep times. Also, the M-types showed a larger initial temperature drop after sleep onset. Comparisons of the outcomes of visual sleep scoring revealed for the M-types a shorter sleep latency and a longer sleep duration. In addition, the M-types reported a higher subjective sleep quality than the E-types. For the M-types sleep stages 3 + 4 and EEG delta (0.5-3.5 Hz) energy declined monotonically across the first 4 NREM/REM cycles. For the E-types, however, no decrement was observed over the first 2 cycles. Analysis of the wave forms of delta energy, employing a pattern recognition technique independent of visual sleep scoring, substantiated this finding. These results are discussed in relation to the differences in circadian characteristics between M-types and E-types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1707791     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90033-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of chronotype in four- to eleven-year-old children: reliability and validity of the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ).

Authors:  Helene Werner; Monique K Lebourgeois; Anja Geiger; Oskar G Jenni
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Human slow wave sleep: a review and appraisal of recent findings, with implications for sleep functions, and psychiatric illness.

Authors:  J Horne
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-10-15

Review 3.  Sleep behavior across the lifespan: How a model can expand our current understanding.

Authors:  Stephanie J Crowley
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 11.609

4.  Circadian preference modulates the neural substrate of conflict processing across the day.

Authors:  Christina Schmidt; Philippe Peigneux; Yves Leclercq; Virginie Sterpenich; Gilles Vandewalle; Christophe Phillips; Pierre Berthomier; Christian Berthomier; Gilberte Tinguely; Steffen Gais; Manuel Schabus; Martin Desseilles; Thanh Dang-Vu; Eric Salmon; Christian Degueldre; Evelyne Balteau; André Luxen; Christian Cajochen; Pierre Maquet; Fabienne Collette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Polymorphisms in the circadian expressed genes PER3 and ARNTL2 are associated with diurnal preference and GNβ3 with sleep measures.

Authors:  Michael J Parsons; Kathryn J Lester; Nicola L Barclay; Simon N Archer; Patrick M Nolan; Thalia C Eley; Alice M Gregory
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.981

6.  Circadian preference towards morningness is associated with lower slow sleep spindle amplitude and intensity in adolescents.

Authors:  Ilona Merikanto; Liisa Kuula; Tommi Makkonen; Róbert Bódizs; Risto Halonen; Kati Heinonen; Jari Lahti; Katri Räikkönen; Anu-Katriina Pesonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Age-related changes in sleep and circadian rhythms: impact on cognitive performance and underlying neuroanatomical networks.

Authors:  Christina Schmidt; Philippe Peigneux; Christian Cajochen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Pushing the Limits: Chronotype and Time of Day Modulate Working Memory-Dependent Cerebral Activity.

Authors:  Christina Schmidt; Fabienne Collette; Carolin F Reichert; Micheline Maire; Gilles Vandewalle; Philippe Peigneux; Christian Cajochen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Sleep Spindle Density Predicts the Effect of Prior Knowledge on Memory Consolidation.

Authors:  Nora Hennies; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Marleen Kempkes; James N Cousins; Penelope A Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.