Literature DB >> 1707789

Acoustic trauma in extracranial magnetic brain stimulation.

S A Counter1, E Borg, L Lofqvist.   

Abstract

The effects of the magnetic coil acoustic artifact (MCAA) associated with extracranial magnetic field stimulation (EMFS) of the brain were studied in normal hearing rabbits. Spectral and intensity analyses showed that the MCAA is a high intensity transient signal with peak energy between 2 and 5 kHz, and peak amplitudes in the first 100-200 mu sec. At EMFS levels of 50-100% of maximum output (2.0 Tesla), the corresponding MCAA levels were 131-142 dB sound pressure level (peak hold) at the outer ear and amplified by the external meatus to reach 145-157 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at the position of the tympanic membrane in rabbits. Measurements of the acoustic middle ear muscle reflex (AMR) in non-anesthetized rabbits indicated that exposure to EMFS levels of 50-100% resulted in correspondingly increasing compound threshold shifts (CTS) and permanent threshold shifts (PTS) in the unprotected ears of the experimental animals. Auditory brain-stem responses (ABR) measures on the same and additional animals corroborated these findings. Morphological studies showed evidence of substantial cochlear trauma at EMFS levels as low as 50%, with increasing severity up to 100% EMFS. Morphological examination of inner ear structures following exposure to the MCAA in the acute preparation (fixed within hours after exposure) showed ruptures between pillar cells and a detached organ of Corti. Preparations examined 3 or more weeks after exposure showed damaged pillar cells, a widespread loss of outer hair cells, fused and fractured inner hair cell stereocilia, and kinocilium outgrowth on inner hair cells. Although this extremely short impulse contains approximately 2 orders of magnitude less acoustic energy than a continuous noise exposure of 131 dB for 15 min, it is substantially more injurious to the cochlea. The present findings suggest that the acoustic artifact produced by the EMFS coil in some clinical instruments may pose a potential risk for temporary and permanent hearing loss in patients and clinicians when held in close proximity to the unprotected ear. Initial studies suggest that the magnetic field alone did not appear to cause permanent hearing impairment. We recommend the use of ear protectors for the patient and clinician during EMFS as a precautionary measure to prevent possible hearing loss from the MCAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1707789     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90031-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

Review 1.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Early and sustained supramarginal gyrus contributions to phonological processing.

Authors:  Magdalena W Sliwinska; Manali Khadilkar; Jonathon Campbell-Ratcliffe; Frances Quevenco; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-28

Review 3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.

Authors:  Tonisha Kearney-Ramos; Margaret Haney
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.201

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating causal brain-behavioral relationships and their time course.

Authors:  Magdalena W Sliwinska; Sylvia Vitello; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Stimulating Multiple-Demand Cortex Enhances Vocabulary Learning.

Authors:  Magdalena W Sliwinska; Inês R Violante; Richard J S Wise; Robert Leech; Joseph T Devlin; Fatemeh Geranmayeh; Adam Hampshire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dual-site TMS demonstrates causal functional connectivity between the left and right posterior temporal sulci during facial expression recognition.

Authors:  Magdalena W Sliwinska; Ryan Elson; David Pitcher
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 8.955

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.