Literature DB >> 17077663

Reliability of grading lissamine green conjunctival staining.

David A Berntsen1, G Lynn Mitchell, Jason J Nichols.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of a lissamine green grading scale for conjunctival images.
METHODS: A 20-second video clip of the right eye of 288 contact lens-wearing individuals was recorded using a digital slip-lamp camera after instilling liquid lissamine green. A single nasal and temporal still image were selected. A masked reader used the Oxford grading scale to grade the images on two occasions whereas a second masked reader graded each image on 1 occasion. kappa statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine the within- and between-grader reliability overall and when the sample was stratified by age, sex, contact lens type, and disease severity.
RESULTS: There was substantial within-grader reliability for both the nasal (kappasimple = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and temporal (kappasimple = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.67-0.79) images. There was moderate between-grader reliability for both the nasal (kappasimple = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.44-0.58) and temporal (kappasimple = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.44-0.58) images. Age, sex, and contact lens type did not affect within- or between-examiner reliability. There may have been an influence of disease severity on within-examiner reliability, because grading of the temporal images was significantly less reliable in the images with more significant staining.
CONCLUSION: Within- and between-grader reliability of lissamine green staining seems to be at least substantial to moderate. Because the extent of conjunctival staining may influence reliability, this should be considered when studies may include patients with significant staining.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17077663     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000208814.94495.a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

Review 1.  The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee.

Authors:  Alan Tomlinson; Anthony J Bron; Donald R Korb; Shiro Amano; Jerry R Paugh; E Ian Pearce; Richard Yee; Norihiko Yokoi; Reiko Arita; Murat Dogru
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Development and Evaluation of Semiautomated Quantification of Lissamine Green Staining of the Bulbar Conjunctiva From Digital Images.

Authors:  Vatinee Y Bunya; Min Chen; Yuanjie Zheng; Mina Massaro-Giordano; James Gee; Ebenezer Daniel; Ryan O'Sullivan; Eli Smith; Richard A Stone; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Diagnosis of dry eye disease and emerging technologies.

Authors:  Maya Salomon-Ben Zeev; Darby Douglas Miller; Robert Latkany
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.

Authors:  Michel Guillon; Kathy Dumbleton; Panagiotis Theodoratos; Trisha Patel; Tom Karkkainen; Kurt Moody
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.018

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.