Literature DB >> 17077418

Will financial incentives stimulate quality improvement? Reactions from frontline physicians.

Stephanie S Teleki1, Cheryl L Damberg, Chau Pham, Sandra H Berry.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance is being applied at the physician level to stimulate improvements in quality of care and cost efficiency; however, little is known about how physicians will respond. We interviewed physicians exposed to a financial incentive program in California to identify possible barriers to the successful application of financial incentives by exploring physicians' opinions of and experiences with pay-for-performance programs. Reasons physicians cited for quality deficiencies included insurance coverage limitations and lack of patient compliance, time, and proper physician oversight. Physicians believe that they play a significant role and have a moderate to high degree of control over quality of care and that it is important to self-monitor. Physicians expressed the need for accurate and timely data, peer comparisons, and more patient time, staff support, and consultations with colleagues to successfully monitor and deliver quality care. Many support increased pay for delivering high-quality care but question measurement accuracy, bonus payment financing, and health plan involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17077418     DOI: 10.1177/1062860606293602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  6 in total

1.  "All the money in the world …" patient perspectives regarding the influence of financial incentives.

Authors:  Heather Schacht Reisinger; Rachel Horner Brackett; Colin D Buzza; Monica B Williams Páez; Ryan Gourley; Mark W Vander Weg; Alan J Christensen; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Implementation of a Managed Care Programme in Germany Using the Example of the Baden-Wuerttemberg Contract on Care in the Field of Cardiology.

Authors:  Patrick Hennrich
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.913

3.  Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Brian L Sprague; Carrie N Klabunde; Anna N A Tosteson; Asaf Bitton; Jane S Chen; Elisabeth F Beaber; Tracy Onega; Charles D MacLean; Kimberly Harris; Kathleen Howe; Loretta Pearson; Sarah Feldman; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  What doctors think about the impact of managed care tools on quality of care, costs, autonomy, and relations with patients.

Authors:  Marie Deom; Thomas Agoritsas; Patrick A Bovier; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Influences on Physicians' Participation in Coordinated Ambulatory Cardiology Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Patrick Hennrich; Regine Bölter; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Pioneering pay-for-quality: lessons from the rewarding results demonstrations.

Authors:  Gary J Young; James F Burgess; Bert White
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2007
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.