BACKGROUND: This study examined the role of genetic and environmental factors explaining individual differences in women's walking ability in old age. METHODS: A maximal walking speed test over 10 meters and a 6-minute walking endurance test were done under standard conditions among 92 monozygotic and 105 dizygotic pairs of twin sisters reared together, aged 63-75 years. RESULTS: The mean maximum walking speed was 1.73 +/- 0.32 m/s and the mean distance covered in the 6-minute walking test was 525.6 +/- 77.3 m. Multivariate genetic modeling showed that a minor part of the variances in walking speed (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%-54%) and endurance (20%, 95% CI: 0%-56%) were accounted for by genetic influences, and that the genetic influences were common to both traits. The corresponding proportions for common environmental factors were 37% (95% CI: 4%-58%) and 26% (95% CI: 0%-52%), and for individual environmental factors 46% (95% CI: 35%-59%) and 54% (95% CI 42%-68%), respectively. The environmental effects were partially common to both traits. CONCLUSIONS: Among relatively healthy older women, a modest portion of the variances of walking speed and endurance were accounted for by genetic factors, whereas shared and individual environmental factors explained most of the variance in both traits.
BACKGROUND: This study examined the role of genetic and environmental factors explaining individual differences in women's walking ability in old age. METHODS: A maximal walking speed test over 10 meters and a 6-minute walking endurance test were done under standard conditions among 92 monozygotic and 105 dizygotic pairs of twin sisters reared together, aged 63-75 years. RESULTS: The mean maximum walking speed was 1.73 +/- 0.32 m/s and the mean distance covered in the 6-minute walking test was 525.6 +/- 77.3 m. Multivariate genetic modeling showed that a minor part of the variances in walking speed (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%-54%) and endurance (20%, 95% CI: 0%-56%) were accounted for by genetic influences, and that the genetic influences were common to both traits. The corresponding proportions for common environmental factors were 37% (95% CI: 4%-58%) and 26% (95% CI: 0%-52%), and for individual environmental factors 46% (95% CI: 35%-59%) and 54% (95% CI 42%-68%), respectively. The environmental effects were partially common to both traits. CONCLUSIONS: Among relatively healthy older women, a modest portion of the variances of walking speed and endurance were accounted for by genetic factors, whereas shared and individual environmental factors explained most of the variance in both traits.
Authors: Kimberly A Faulkner; Jane A Cauley; Stephen M Roth; Candace Kammerer; Katie Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc Hochberg; Michael C Nevitt; Joseph M Zmuda Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-02-18
Authors: Miriam Sander; Kirsten Avlund; Martin Lauritzen; Tina Gottlieb; Barry Halliwell; Tinna Stevnsner; Ulla Wewer; Vilhelm A Bohr Journal: Mech Ageing Dev Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 5.432
Authors: Hieab H H Adams; Vincentius J A Verlinden; Michele L Callisaya; Cornelia M van Duijn; Albert Hofman; Russell Thomson; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jos N van der Geest; Velandai Srikanth; M Arfan Ikram Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Todd M Manini; Thomas W Buford; John A Kairalla; Mary M McDermott; Carlos A Vaz Fragoso; Roger A Fielding; Fang-Chi Hsu; Neil Johannsen; Stephen Kritchevsky; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman; Steven R Cummings; Abby C King; Marco Pahor; Adam J Santanasto; Gregory J Tranah Journal: Geroscience Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Riccardo E Marioni; Ian J Deary; Sarah E Harris; Valentina Riggio; Louise Evenden; Tamara Gilchrist; Sarah McCafferty; Lee Murphy; Nicola Wrobel; Adele M Taylor; Janie Corley; Alison Pattie; Simon R Cox; Carmen Martin-Ruiz; James Prendergast; John M Starr Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Dan Ben-Avraham; David Karasik; Joe Verghese; Kathryn L Lunetta; Jennifer A Smith; John D Eicher; Rotem Vered; Joris Deelen; Alice M Arnold; Aron S Buchman; Toshiko Tanaka; Jessica D Faul; Maria Nethander; Myriam Fornage; Hieab H Adams; Amy M Matteini; Michele L Callisaya; Albert V Smith; Lei Yu; Philip L De Jager; Denis A Evans; Vilmundur Gudnason; Albert Hofman; Alison Pattie; Janie Corley; Lenore J Launer; Davis S Knopman; Neeta Parimi; Stephen T Turner; Stefania Bandinelli; Marian Beekman; Danielle Gutman; Lital Sharvit; Simon P Mooijaart; David C Liewald; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Claes Ohlsson; Matthijs Moed; Vincent J Verlinden; Dan Mellström; Jos N van der Geest; Magnus Karlsson; Dena Hernandez; Rebekah McWhirter; Yongmei Liu; Russell Thomson; Gregory J Tranah; Andre G Uitterlinden; David R Weir; Wei Zhao; John M Starr; Andrew D Johnson; M Arfan Ikram; David A Bennett; Steven R Cummings; Ian J Deary; Tamara B Harris; Sharon L R Kardia; Thomas H Mosley; Velandai K Srikanth; Beverly G Windham; Ann B Newman; Jeremy D Walston; Gail Davies; Daniel S Evans; Eline P Slagboom; Luigi Ferrucci; Douglas P Kiel; Joanne M Murabito; Gil Atzmon Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 5.955