Literature DB >> 17076990

The incremental costs of recommended therapy versus real world therapy in type 2 diabetes patients.

C Crivera1, D C Suh, E S Huang, E Cagliero, R W Grant, L Vo, H C Shin, J B Meigs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goals of diabetes management have evolved over the past decade to become the attainment of near-normal glucose and cardiovascular risk factor levels. Improved metabolic control is achieved through optimized medication regimens, but costs specifically associated with such optimization have not been examined.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental medication cost of providing optimal therapy to reach recommended goals versus actual therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: We randomly selected the charts of 601 type 2 diabetes patients receiving care from the outpatient clinics of Massachusetts General Hospital March 1, 1996-August 31, 1997 and abstracted clinical and medication data. We applied treatment algorithms based on 2004 clinical practice guidelines for hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension to patients' current medication therapy to determine how current medication regimens could be improved to attain recommended treatment goals. Four clinicians and three pharmacists independently applied the algorithms and reached consensus on recommended therapies. Mean incremental medication costs, the cost differences between current and recommended therapies, per patient (expressed in 2004 dollars) were calculated with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65 years old, mean duration of diabetes was 7.7 years, 32% had ideal glucose control, 25% had ideal systolic blood pressure, and 24% had ideal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Care for these diabetes patients was similar to that observed in recent national studies. If treatment algorithm recommendations were applied, the average annual medication cost/patient would increase from 1525 to 2164 dollars. Annual incremental costs/patient increased by 168 dollars (95% CI 133-206 dollars) for antihyperglycemic medications, 75 dollars (57-93 dollars) for antihypertensive medications, 392 dollars (354-434 dollars) for antihyperlipidemic medications, and 3 dollars (3-4 dollars) for aspirin prophylaxis. Yearly incremental cost of recommended laboratory testing ranged from 77-189 dollars/patient. LIMITATIONS: Although baseline data come from the clinics of a single academic institution, collected in 1997, the care of these diabetes patients was remarkably similar to care recently observed nationally. In addition, the data are dependent on the medical record and may not accurately reflect patients' actual experiences.
CONCLUSION: Average yearly incremental cost of optimizing drug regimens to achieve recommended treatment goals for type 2 diabetes was approximately 600 dollars/patient. These results provide valuable input for assessing the cost-effectiveness of improving comprehensive diabetes care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076990      PMCID: PMC2291353          DOI: 10.1185/030079906X132523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  23 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Assessing and comparing costs: how robust are the bootstrap and methods based on asymptotic normality?

Authors:  Anthony O'Hagan; John W Stevens
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Model of complications of NIDDM. II. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia.

Authors:  R C Eastman; J C Javitt; W H Herman; E J Dasbach; C Copley-Merriman; W Maier; F Dong; D Manninen; A S Zbrozek; J Kotsanos; S A Garfield; M Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Disease management and the organization of physician practice.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Enrico Cagliero; Patricia Murphy-Sheehy; Daniel E Singer; David M Nathan; James B Meigs
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter Gaede; Pernille Vedel; Nicolai Larsen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Oluf Pedersen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current management guidelines.

Authors:  Arshag D Mooradian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13

10.  Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Carol E Koro; Steven J Bowlin; Nancy Bourgeois; Donald O Fedder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of an over-the-counter glycated hemoglobin (A1C) test kit.

Authors:  Anna Chang; Joy Frank; Jennifer Knaebel; Jeanellen Fullam; Scott Pardo; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  The impact of diabetes on prescription drug costs: the population-based Turin study.

Authors:  G Bruno; L Karaghiosoff; F Merletti; G Costa; M De Maria; F Panero; O Segre; P Cavallo-Perin; R Gnavi
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 10.122

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.