Literature DB >> 17076948

Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy: A useful treatment option for complete complex staghorn calculi.

Prem A Ramakrishnan1, Younis H Al-Bulushi, Mohammed Medhat, Priti Nair, Salma G Mawali, Venkat P Sampige.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of complete staghorn calculi represents a challenging problem for urologists. We describe our technique and clinical experience with modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy in patients harboring large, extensively branched staghorn calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1996 to February 2005 twenty-six patients with complete staghorn calculi defined as filling the entire collecting system or at least 80% of it, were treated employing a modification of the classical anatrophic nephrolithotomy technique. The mean patient age was 46 (range 16-70) years and the mean stone size was 3150 (range 1375-4800) mm2. Intra-operative data, complications and stone-free rates were recorded. Long-term follow-up was completed in 22 patients with a mean duration of 38 (range 12-96) months. Renal function was evaluated by 99mTc dimercapto succinic acid renal scintigraphy before and 6 months after treatment.
RESULTS: The mean ischemia time was 36 (range 20-45) minutes, mean operative time was 195 (range 170-235) minutes and the mean blood loss was 475 (range 300-750) ml. Length of hospital stay averaged 8.8 days. One patient developed significant hematuria requiring renal angiography and embolization of a pseudoaneurysm. Overall, 22 patients (85%) were rendered stone-free at discharge while 23 patients (88%) were observed to be stone-free after 3 months. Long-term follow-up demonstrated recurrent stone fragments less than 4 mm in three patients. Isotope studies revealed that renal function remained unchanged in 55%, improved in 32% and became worse in the small number of remaining patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy is a valuable treatment option for patients with complete staghorn calculi. Because of its efficacy, safety and simplicity we believe that the use of this surgical procedure is warranted in patients with a large, extensively branched, complex renal stone burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  4 in total

1.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: Are we really healing our patients?

Authors:  Leonardo de Albuquerque Dos Santos Abreu; Douglas Gregório Camilo-Silva; Gustavo Fiedler; Gustavo Barboza Corguinha; Matheus Miranda Paiva; João Antonio Pereira-Correia; Valter José Fernandes Muller
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Mansour Masoumi; Bahman Goshtasbi; Amirhossein Aminsharifi; Reza Mohamadian
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Using verapamil as protective factor in renal ischemia reperfusion injury during anatrophic nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Damir Aganović; Benjamin Kulovac; Alden Prcić; Osman Hadziosmanović
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.363

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.