Literature DB >> 17076427

Paramedic student performance: comparison of online with on-campus lecture delivery methods.

Michael W Hubble1, Michael E Richards.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colleges and universities are experiencing increasing demand for online courses in many healthcare disciplines, including emergency medical services (EMS). Development and implementation of online paramedic courses with the quality of education experienced in the traditional classroom setting is essential in order to maintain the integrity of the educational process. Currently, there is conflicting evidence of whether a significant difference exists in student performance between online and traditional nursing and allied health courses. However, there are no published investigations of the effectiveness of online learning by paramedic students. HYPOTHESIS: Performance of paramedic students enrolled in an online, undergraduate, research methods course is equivalent to the performance of students enrolled in the same course provided in a traditional, classroom environment.
METHODS: Academic performance, learning styles, and course satisfaction surveys were compared between two groups of students. The course content was identical for both courses and taught by the same instructor during the same semester. The primary difference between the traditional course and the online course was the method of lecture delivery. Lectures for the on-campus students were provided live in a traditional classroom setting using PowerPoint slides. Lectures for the online students were provided using the same PowerPoint slides with prerecorded streaming audio and video.
RESULTS: A convenience sample of 23 online and 10 traditional students participated in this study. With the exception of two learning domains, the two groups of students exhibited similar learning styles as assessed using the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales instrument. The online students scored significantly lower in the competitive and dependent dimensions than did the on-campus students. Academic performance was similar between the two groups. The online students devoted slightly more time to the course than did the campus students, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. In general, the online students believed the online audio lectures were more effective than the traditional live lectures.
CONCLUSION: Distance learning technology appears to be an effective mechanism for extending didactic paramedic education off-campus, and may be beneficial particularly to areas that lack paramedic training programs or adequate numbers of qualified instructors.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076427     DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00003800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  5 in total

1.  Health informatics for pediatric disaster preparedness planning.

Authors:  R V Burke; T Ryutov; R Neches; J S Upperman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course.

Authors:  Andrea L Porter; Michael E Pitterle; Mary S Hayney
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Exploring the educational challenges in emergency medical students: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ali Afshari; Masoud Khodaveisi; Efat Sadeghian
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2021-04

4.  Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.

Authors:  Arne Peine; Klaus Kabino; Cord Spreckelsen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Adaptation of the Grasha Riechman Student Learning Style Survey and Teaching Style Inventory to assess individual teaching and learning styles in a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  James H Ford; James M Robinson; Meg E Wise
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.