Literature DB >> 17076340

Figure-ground assignment in pigeons: evidence for a figural benefit.

Olga E Lazareva1, Leyre Castro, Shaun P Vecera, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Four pigeons discriminated whether a target spot appeared on a colored figural shape or on a differently colored background by first pecking the target and then reporting its location: on the figure or the background. We recorded three dependent variables: target detection time, choice response time, and choice accuracy. The birds were faster to detect the target, to report its location, and to learn the correct response on figure trials than on background trials. Later tests suggested that the pigeons might have attended to the figural region as a whole rather than using local properties in performing the figure-background discrimination. The location of the figural region did not affect figure-ground assignment. Finally, when 4 other pigeons had to detect and peck the target without making a choice report, no figural advantage emerged in target detection time, suggesting that the birds' attention may not have been automatically summoned to the figural region.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076340     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Visual prior entry for foreground figures.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Lauren N Hecht; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

2.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Edge-region grouping in figure-ground organization and depth perception.

Authors:  Stephen E Palmer; Joseph L Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Figure-ground discrimination in the avian brain: the nucleus rotundus and its inhibitory complex.

Authors:  Martin J Acerbo; Olga F Lazareva; John McInnerney; Emily Leiker; Edward A Wasserman; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Changes in area affect figure-ground assignment in pigeons.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Olga F Lazareva; Shaun P Vecera; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Systematic Analysis of Pigeons' Discrimination of Pixelated Stimuli: A Hierarchical Pattern Recognition System Is Not Identifiable.

Authors:  Juan D Delius; Julia A M Delius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pigeons (Columba livia) as Trainable Observers of Pathology and Radiology Breast Cancer Images.

Authors:  Richard M Levenson; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Victor M Navarro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.