Bao-Jin Zhai1, Ze-Yong Shao, Chun-Liang Zhao, Kai Hu, Feng Wu. 1. Clinical Center for Tumor Therapy of 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Box 153, Institute of Ultra-sonic Engineering in Medicine, Chongqing University of Medical Sciences, 1 Medical College Road, Chongqing 400016, China.
Abstract
AIM: To establish a multidrug resistant (MDR) cell sub-line from the human hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2) in nude mice. METHODS: HepG2 cell cultures were incubated with increasing concentrations of adriamycin (ADM) to develop an ADM-resistant cell subline (HepG2/ADM) with cross-resistance to other chemotherapeutic agents. Twenty male athymic BALB/c-nu/nu mice were randomized into HepG2/nude and HepG2/ADM/nude groups (10 in each group). A cell suspension (either HepG2 or HepG2/ADM) was injected subcutaneously into mice in each group. Tumor growth was recorded, and animals were sacrificed 4-5 wk after cell implantation. Tumors were prepared for histology, and viable tumor was dispersed into a single-cell suspension. The IC50 values for a number of chemotherapeutic agents were determined by 2, 3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt (MTT) assay. Rhodamine-123 retention/efflux and the level of resistance-associated proteins were determined by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of mdr1, mrp and lrp genes was detected using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in HepG2/nude and HepG2/ADM/nude groups. RESULTS: The appearances of HepG2/nude cells were slightly different from those of HepG2/ADM/nude cells. Similar tumor growth curves were determined in both groups. A cross-resistance to ADM, vincristine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was seen in HepG2/ADM/nude group. The levels of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated proteins were significantly increased. The mRNA expression levels of mdr1, mrp and lrp were higher in HepG2/ADM/nude cells. CONCLUSION: ADM-resistant HepG2 subline in nude mice has a cross resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. It may be used as an in vivo model to investigate the mechanisms of MDR, and explore the targeted approaches to overcoming MDR.
AIM: To establish a multidrug resistant (MDR) cell sub-line from the human hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2) in nude mice. METHODS: HepG2 cell cultures were incubated with increasing concentrations of adriamycin (ADM) to develop an ADM-resistant cell subline (HepG2/ADM) with cross-resistance to other chemotherapeutic agents. Twenty male athymic BALB/c-nu/nu mice were randomized into HepG2/nude and HepG2/ADM/nude groups (10 in each group). A cell suspension (either HepG2 or HepG2/ADM) was injected subcutaneously into mice in each group. Tumor growth was recorded, and animals were sacrificed 4-5 wk after cell implantation. Tumors were prepared for histology, and viable tumor was dispersed into a single-cell suspension. The IC50 values for a number of chemotherapeutic agents were determined by 2, 3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt (MTT) assay. Rhodamine-123 retention/efflux and the level of resistance-associated proteins were determined by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of mdr1, mrp and lrp genes was detected using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in HepG2/nude and HepG2/ADM/nude groups. RESULTS: The appearances of HepG2/nude cells were slightly different from those of HepG2/ADM/nude cells. Similar tumor growth curves were determined in both groups. A cross-resistance to ADM, vincristine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was seen in HepG2/ADM/nude group. The levels of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated proteins were significantly increased. The mRNA expression levels of mdr1, mrp and lrp were higher in HepG2/ADM/nude cells. CONCLUSION:ADM-resistant HepG2 subline in nude mice has a cross resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. It may be used as an in vivo model to investigate the mechanisms of MDR, and explore the targeted approaches to overcoming MDR.
Authors: A Monks; D Scudiero; P Skehan; R Shoemaker; K Paull; D Vistica; C Hose; J Langley; P Cronise; A Vaigro-Wolff Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1991-06-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Müller; C Meijer; G J Zaman; P Borst; R J Scheper; N H Mulder; E G de Vries; P L Jansen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-12-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G L Scheffer; P L Wijngaard; M J Flens; M A Izquierdo; M L Slovak; H M Pinedo; C J Meijer; H C Clevers; R J Scheper Journal: Nat Med Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: M A Izquierdo; R H Shoemaker; M J Flens; G L Scheffer; L Wu; T R Prather; R J Scheper Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1996-01-17 Impact factor: 7.396