Literature DB >> 17075684

Side errors in neurosurgery.

P Mitchell1, C L Nicholson, A Jenkins.   

Abstract

Eight cases of neurosurgical operations being performed on the wrong side were studied. Safeguards of confidentiality were used. In seven cases side marking was not done and the surgeons felt that had it been done, the mistake would have or may have been prevented. In all but one case the surgeon's normal side check was omitted. Distracting circumstances contributed to the checks being omitted in these seven cases. In the one case where the check was carried out the mistake was made because the patient had been marked on the wrong side. In no case was the mistake made because of ambiguous or absent site data in the imaging or notes. It is concluded that to prevent these mistakes emphasis should be placed on ensuring that the preoperative site check is completed more than on ensuring that unambiguous side information is available in the notes and imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075684     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-006-1041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  3 in total

1.  Side errors in neurosurgery and human factors training.

Authors:  Patrick Mitchell; Trevor Dale
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  The 5th anniversary of the "Universal Protocol": pitfalls and pearls revisited.

Authors:  Philip F Stahel; Philip S Mehler; Ted J Clarke; Jeffrey Varnell
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Intraoperative disc level marking with needle: a technical note and prospective study on 30 patients.

Authors:  Marc Prod'homme; Didier Grasset; Mélissa Lecocq; Duccio Boscherini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.