Literature DB >> 17075582

Computerized morphometry as an aid in determining the grade of dysplasia and progression to adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Edmond Sabo1, Andrew H Beck, Elizabeth A Montgomery, Baishali Bhattacharya, Patricia Meitner, Ji Yi Wang, Murray B Resnick.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to use computerized morphometry in order to differentiate between the degree of dysplasia and to predict progression to invasive adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Biopsies from 97 patients with BE graded by a consensus forum of expert gastrointestinal pathologists were available for morphometrical analysis. The study group included 36 biopsies negative for dysplasia (ND), none of which progressed to carcinoma; 16 indefinite for dysplasia (IND) and 21 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), of which three progressed in each group and 24 high-grade dysplasia (HGD), of which 15 progressed to invasive carcinoma. Computerized morphometry was used for measuring indices of size, shape, texture, symmetry and architectural distribution of the epithelial nuclei. Low-grade dysplasia was best differentiated from the ND group by nuclear pseudostratification (P=0.036), pleomorphism (P<0.01), and chromatin texture (margination, P<0.01) and from the HGD group by nuclear area (P<0.01), pleomorphism (P<0.01), chromatin texture (margination, P<0.01), symmetry (P<0.01), and orientation (P=0.027). These results were validated on a new set of cases (n=55) using a neural network model, resulting in an accuracy of 89% for differentiating between the ND and LGD groups and 86% for differentiating between the LGD and HGD groups. Within the HGD group, univariate significant predictors of the progression interval to carcinoma were: indices of nuclear texture (heterogeneity: P=0.0019, s.d.-OD: P=0.005) and orientation: P=0.022. Nuclear texture (heterogeneity) was the only independent predictor of progression (P=0.004, hazard=11.54) by Cox's multivariate test. This study proposes that computerized morphometry is a valid tool for determining the grade of dysplasia in BE. Moreover, histomorphometric quantification of nuclear texture is a powerful tool for predicting progression to invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with HGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075582     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  15 in total

1.  Early histological findings may predict the clinical phenotype in Crohn's colitis.

Authors:  Amir Klein; Yoav Mazor; Amir Karban; Ofer Ben-Itzhak; Yehuda Chowers; Edmond Sabo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Corpus Callosum Shape Analysis with Application to Dyslexia.

Authors:  Manuel F Casanova; Ayman El-Baz; Ahmed Elnakib; Jay Giedd; Judith M Rumsey; Emily L Williams; Andrew E Switala
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.757

3.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Dysplasia discrimination in intestinal-type neoplasia of the esophagus and colon via digital image analysis.

Authors:  David R Martin; David R Braxton; Alton B Farris
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A BAYESIAN MARK INTERACTION MODEL FOR ANALYSIS OF TUMOR PATHOLOGY IMAGES.

Authors:  Qiwei Li; Xinlei Wang; Faming Liang; Guanghua Xiao
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 6.  [Subjective grading of Barrett's neoplasia by pathologists: correlation with objective histomorphometric variables].

Authors:  E Sabo; G Klorin; E Montgomery; K C Drumea; O Ben-Izhak; J Lachter; M Vieth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  BOB CAT: A Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett's Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Paul Moayyedi; Douglas A Corley; John DeCaestecker; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Gary Falk; Nimish Vakil; Scott Sanders; Michael Vieth; John Inadomi; David Aldulaimi; Khek-Yu Ho; Robert Odze; Stephen J Meltzer; Eamonn Quigley; Stuart Gittens; Peter Watson; Giovanni Zaninotto; Prasad G Iyer; Leo Alexandre; Yeng Ang; James Callaghan; Rebecca Harrison; Rajvinder Singh; Pradeep Bhandari; Raf Bisschops; Bita Geramizadeh; Philip Kaye; Sheila Krishnadath; M Brian Fennerty; Hendrik Manner; Katie S Nason; Oliver Pech; Vani Konda; Krish Ragunath; Imdadur Rahman; Yvonne Romero; Richard Sampliner; Peter D Siersema; Jan Tack; Tony C K Tham; Nigel Trudgill; David S Weinberg; Jean Wang; Kenneth Wang; Jennie Y Y Wong; Stephen Attwood; Peter Malfertheiner; David MacDonald; Hugh Barr; Mark K Ferguson; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Can morphometric analysis of the fallopian tube fimbria predict the presence of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC)?

Authors:  Amnon Amit; Edmond Sabo; Avielle Movsas; Yamit Efrat-Tamam; Ari Reiss; Emad Matanes; Geula Klorin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Histopathological distinction of non-invasive and invasive bladder cancers using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Peng-Nien Yin; Kishan Kc; Shishi Wei; Qi Yu; Rui Li; Anne R Haake; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Feng Cui
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Ce Zhang; Gerald J Berry; Russ B Altman; Christopher Ré; Daniel L Rubin; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.