OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay to differentiate between trachoma and lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) biovars of Chlamydia trachomatis and to validate its performance with the conventional genotyping method. STUDY: Swab specimens from 115 patients with anorectal symptoms or syndromes associated with LGV were tested by a real-time M-PCR assay and the results compared with the PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the major outer membrane protein gene (omp1). RESULTS: A high agreement of 96.5% (111 of 115 specimens) was found between the real-time M-PCR testing and the standard genotyping method for the detection of C. trachomatis DNA (kappa value, 0.945, P <0.00001). Both methods identified 53 LGV, 32 non-LGV C. trachomatis, and 26 negative specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time M-PCR assay simultaneously detects and differentiates LGV from non-LGV strains using swab specimens. This assay offers a relatively rapid and sensitive alternative for the diagnosis of LGV infection and is a useful tool for screening and for outbreak investigations.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay to differentiate between trachoma and lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) biovars of Chlamydia trachomatis and to validate its performance with the conventional genotyping method. STUDY: Swab specimens from 115 patients with anorectal symptoms or syndromes associated with LGV were tested by a real-time M-PCR assay and the results compared with the PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the major outer membrane protein gene (omp1). RESULTS: A high agreement of 96.5% (111 of 115 specimens) was found between the real-time M-PCR testing and the standard genotyping method for the detection of C. trachomatis DNA (kappa value, 0.945, P <0.00001). Both methods identified 53 LGV, 32 non-LGV C. trachomatis, and 26 negative specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time M-PCR assay simultaneously detects and differentiates LGV from non-LGV strains using swab specimens. This assay offers a relatively rapid and sensitive alternative for the diagnosis of LGV infection and is a useful tool for screening and for outbreak investigations.
Authors: R Martin-Iguacel; J M Llibre; H Nielsen; E Heras; L Matas; R Lugo; B Clotet; G Sirera Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Heather Jebbari; Sarah Alexander; Helen Ward; Barry Evans; Maria Solomou; Alicia Thornton; Gillian Dean; John White; Patrick French; Catherine Ison Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Jimmy Twin; Matthew P Stevens; Suzanne M Garland; Angelo M Zaia; Sepehr N Tabrizi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jose Paolo V Magbanua; Beng Tin Goh; Claude-Edouard Michel; Aura Aguirre-Andreasen; Sarah Alexander; Ines Ushiro-Lumb; Catherine Ison; Helen Lee Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2007-06-13 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Evonne N Woodson; Samantha S Katz; Sheree S Mosley; Damien C Danavall; Katherine E Bowden; Kai-Hua Chi; Brian H Raphael Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Chloe Manning; Colette O'Neill; Ian N Clarke; Monica Rebec; Penelope R Cliff; Peter Marsh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.240