Literature DB >> 17075375

Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation improves the outcome of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a helmet.

Vittorio Antonaglia1, Umberto Lucangelo, Walter A Zin, Alberto Peratoner, Loredana De Simoni, Guido Capitanio, Sara Pascotto, Antonino Gullo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) by mouthpiece during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with helmet in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: General intensive care unit, university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients with exacerbation of COPD ventilated with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation by helmet were randomized to two different mucus clearance strategies: IPV (IPV group) vs. respiratory physiotherapy (Phys group). As historical control group, 40 patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure and ventilated by face mask treated with respiratory physiotherapy were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Two daily sessions of IPV (IPV group) or conventional respiratory physiotherapy (Phys group).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic variables were measured at entry in the intensive care unit, before and after the first session of IPV, and at discharge from the intensive care unit. Outcome variables (need for intubation, ventilatory assistance, length of intensive care unit stay, and complications) were also measured. All physiologic variables improved after IPV. At discharge from the intensive care unit, Paco2 was lower in the IPV group compared with the Phys and control groups (mean +/- sd, 58 +/- 5.4 vs. 64 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, 67.4 +/- 4.2 mm Hg, p < .01). Pao2/Fio2 was higher in IPV (274 +/- 15) than the other groups (Phys, 218 +/- 34; control, 237 +/- 20; p < .01). In the IPV group, time of noninvasive ventilation (hrs) (median, 25th-75th percentile: 61, 60-71) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (days) (7, 6-8) were lower than other groups (Phys, 89, 82-96; control, 87, 75-91; p < .01; and Phys, 9, 8-9; control, 10, 9-11; p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: IPV treatment was feasible for all patients. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation by helmet associated with IPV reduces the duration of ventilatory treatment and intensive care unit stay and improves gas exchange at discharge from intensive care unit in patients with severe exacerbation of COPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075375     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000248725.15189.7D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

1.  Gas distribution in a two-compartment model ventilated in high-frequency percussive and pressure-controlled modes.

Authors:  Umberto Lucangelo; Agostino Accardo; Alessandro Bernardi; Massimo Ferluga; Massimo Borelli; Vittorio Antonaglia; Fabio Riscica; Walter A Zin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation superimposed on spontaneous breathing: a physiological study in patients at risk for extubation failure.

Authors:  Saoussen Dimassi; Frédéric Vargas; Aissam Lyazidi; Ferran Roche-Campo; Jean Dellamonica; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Early fiberoptic bronchoscopy during non-invasive ventilation in patients with decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to community-acquired-pneumonia.

Authors:  Raffaele Scala; Mario Naldi; Uberto Maccari
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Physical therapy practice patterns in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Leslie Harth; Jennifer Stuart; Catherine Montgomery; Karol Pintier; Susan Czyzo; Kylie Hill; Roger Goldstein; Dina Brooks
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Feasibility and safety of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in spontaneously breathing, non-ventilated patients in critical care: A retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Anwar Hassan; Maree Milross; William Lai; Deepa Shetty; Jennifer Alison; Stephen Huang
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-03-12

6.  Effects of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation on airway mucus clearance: A bench model.

Authors:  Lorena Fernandez-Restrepo; Lauren Shaffer; Bravein Amalakuhan; Marcos I Restrepo; Jay Peters; Ruben Restrepo
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08-04

7.  Early use of noninvasive techniques for clearing respiratory secretions during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnic encephalopathy: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jinrong Wang; Zhaobo Cui; Shuhong Liu; Xiuling Gao; Pan Gao; Yi Shi; Shufen Guo; Peipei Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Safety and effectiveness of the high-frequency chest wall oscillation vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in patients with severe COPD.

Authors:  Antonello Nicolini; Bruna Grecchi; Maura Ferrari-Bravo; Cornelius Barlascini
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 9.  Timing of noninvasive ventilation failure: causes, risk factors, and potential remedies.

Authors:  Ezgi Ozyilmaz; Aylin Ozsancak Ugurlu; Stefano Nava
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  Effect of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation on intensive care unit length of stay, the incidence of pneumonia and gas exchange in critically ill patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anwar Hassan; William Lai; Jennifer Alison; Stephen Huang; Maree Milross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.