Literature DB >> 17075205

Does brachial pulse pressure predict coronary events?

Paolo Verdecchia1, Fabio Angeli.   

Abstract

Brachial pulse pressure (PP) is an established risk marker for cardiovascular disease. PP is largely determined by the stroke volume in young subjects, although the progressive amplification of pulse wave from central to peripheral arteries could make brachial PP not representative of the central PP in the young. With advancing age, brachial PP better reflects the progressive stiffening of aorta and the large elastic arteries. PP correlates with vascular and cardiac hypertrophy, although the association with cardiac hypertrophy seems more closely attributable to systolic blood pressure (BP). An association has been noted in several longitudinal studies between PP and the incidence of major cardiovascular events. However, some longitudinal studies carried out in subjects with predominantly systolic and diastolic hypertension showed that PP is the dominant predictor of coronary events, while mean BP is the major predictor of cerebrovascular events. Such an assumption may not be held in subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, where a wide PP seems to predict coronary and cerebrovascular events to a similar extent. From a pathophysiological standpoint, a wide PP might reflect diffuse atherosclerotic processes potentially involving also the large coronary arteries. Some data suggest that a wide PP could also represent a direct and independent stimulus for progression of atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17075205     DOI: 10.1159/000096727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Cardiol        ISSN: 0065-2326


  2 in total

1.  Impaired left ventricular stroke volume reserve during clinical dobutamine stress predicts future episodes of pulmonary edema.

Authors:  Charaslak Charoenpanichkit; William C Little; Sangeeta Mandapaka; Erica Dall'Armellina; Timothy M Morgan; Craig A Hamilton; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Impact of mental and physical stress on blood pressure and pulse pressure under normobaric versus hypoxic conditions.

Authors:  Michael Trapp; Eva-Maria Trapp; Josef W Egger; Wolfgang Domej; Giuseppe Schillaci; Alexander Avian; Peter M Rohrer; Nina Hörlesberger; Dieter Magometschnigg; Mila Cervar-Zivkovic; Peter Komericki; Rosemarie Velik; Johannes Baulmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.