Literature DB >> 17074954

An inverse relationship between perceived harm and participation willingness in schizophrenia research protocols.

Laura Weiss Roberts1, Katherine Green Hammond, Jinger Hoop.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study attempted to clarify how people with schizophrenia evaluate the potential harm associated with various research-related procedures and how these assessments relate to participation willingness.
METHOD: The authors conducted a semistructured interview among participants with schizophrenia.
RESULTS: Sixty participants with schizophrenia rated four procedures as harmful (e.g., symptom induction), five procedures as moderately harmful (e.g., being given a placebo), and six procedures as not harmful (e.g., undergoing a physical examination). Rated willingness to participate was inversely related to the participants' perceptions of harmfulness for all procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, people living with schizophrenia perceived different research procedures as posing different levels of possible harm. Potential harm appears to be an important consideration in protocol enrollment decisions. This work reaffirms the value of clarifying the strengths of seriously ill people who may choose to participate in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17074954     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  14 in total

Review 1.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Feasibility of reducing the duration of placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Robert P McMahon; Deanna L Kelly; Douglas L Boggs; Lan Li; Qiaoyan Hu; John M Davis; William T Carpenter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Addressing risks to advance mental health research.

Authors:  Ana S Iltis; Sahana Misra; Laura B Dunn; Gregory K Brown; Amy Campbell; Sarah A Earll; Anne Glowinski; Whitney B Hadley; Ronald Pies; James M Dubois
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

5.  Giving voice to study volunteers: comparing views of mentally ill, physically ill, and healthy protocol participants on ethical aspects of clinical research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Worth the risk? Relationship of incentives to risk and benefit perceptions and willingness to participate in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Daniel S Kim; Ian E Fellows; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Hidden Empirical Research Ethics: A Review of Three Health Journals from 2005 through 2006.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Rebecca L Volpe; Erica K Rangel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  The investigator and the IRB: a survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers.

Authors:  Bernard A Fischer; Praveen George
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Negative association of perceived risk and willingness to participate in innovative psychiatric research protocols.

Authors:  Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Laura B Dunn; Katie Ryan; Kyle Lane-McKinley; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Paradigm shifts in disability and health: toward more ethical public health research.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Dora M Raymaker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.