Literature DB >> 17074708

Use of flawed multiple-choice items by the New England Journal of Medicine for continuing medical education.

Alex S Stagnaro-Green1, Steven M Downing.   

Abstract

Physicians in the United States are required to complete a minimum number of continuing medical education (CME) credits annually. The goal of CME is to ensure that physicians maintain their knowledge and skills throughout their medical career. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) provides its readers with the opportunity to obtain weekly CME credits. Deviation from established item-writing principles may result in a decrease in validity evidence for tests. This study evaluated the quality of 40 NEJM MCQs using the standard evidence-based principles of effective item writing. Each multiple-choice item reviewed had at least three item flaws, with a mean of 5.1 and a range of 3 to 7. The results of this study demonstrate that the NEJM uses flawed MCQs in its weekly CME program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17074708     DOI: 10.1080/01421590600711153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  6 in total

1.  [Improvement of CME questions from Der Nervenarzt].

Authors:  A Gutmann; U Degirmenci; S Kreil; J Kornhuber; M Weih
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Continuing medical education in deutsches arzteblatt - an analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge; Catrin Marx
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research: a controlled before-and-after study.

Authors:  Bernd Löwe; Mechthild Hartmann; Beate Wild; Christoph Nikendei; Kurt Kroenke; Dorothea Niehoff; Peter Henningsen; Stephan Zipfel; Wolfgang Herzog
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.

Authors:  Bonnie R Rush; David C Rankin; Brad J White
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Fixed or mixed: a comparison of three, four and mixed-option multiple-choice tests in a Fetal Surveillance Education Program.

Authors:  Nathan Zoanetti; Mark Beaves; Patrick Griffin; Euan M Wallace
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Technical flaws in multiple-choice questions in the access exam to medical specialties ("examen MIR") in Spain (2009-2013).

Authors:  María Cristina Rodríguez-Díez; Manuel Alegre; Nieves Díez; Leire Arbea; Marta Ferrer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.