A Paxton1, P Bailey, S Lobis. 1. Averting Maternal Death and Disability (AMDD) Program, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ap428@columbia.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The paper reviews the experience with the EmOC process indicators, and evaluates whether the indicators serve the purposes for which they were originally created - to gather and interpret relatively accessible data to design and implement EmOC service programs. METHOD: We review experience with each of the 6 process indicators individually, and monitoring change over time, at the level of the facility and at the level of a region or country. We identify problems encountered in the field with data collection and interpretation. RESULT: While they have strengths and weaknesses, the process indicators in general serve the purposes for which they were developed. The data are easily collected, but some data problems were identified. We recommend several relatively minor modifications to improve data collection, interpretation and utility. CONCLUSIONS: The EmOC process indicators have been used successfully in a wide variety of settings. They describe vital elements of the health system and how well that system is functioning for women at risk of dying from major obstetric complications.
OBJECTIVE: The paper reviews the experience with the EmOC process indicators, and evaluates whether the indicators serve the purposes for which they were originally created - to gather and interpret relatively accessible data to design and implement EmOC service programs. METHOD: We review experience with each of the 6 process indicators individually, and monitoring change over time, at the level of the facility and at the level of a region or country. We identify problems encountered in the field with data collection and interpretation. RESULT: While they have strengths and weaknesses, the process indicators in general serve the purposes for which they were developed. The data are easily collected, but some data problems were identified. We recommend several relatively minor modifications to improve data collection, interpretation and utility. CONCLUSIONS: The EmOC process indicators have been used successfully in a wide variety of settings. They describe vital elements of the health system and how well that system is functioning for women at risk of dying from major obstetric complications.
Authors: Wit Wichaidit; Mahbub-Ul Alam; Amal K Halder; Leanne Unicomb; Davidson H Hamer; Pavani K Ram Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sara E Casey; Kathleen T Mitchell; Immaculée Mulamba Amisi; Martin Migombano Haliza; Blandine Aveledi; Prince Kalenga; Judy Austin Journal: Confl Health Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 2.723
Authors: Adam Gyedu; Lynette Lester; Barclay Stewart; Kwabena A Danso; Emmanuella L Salia; Robert Quansah; Peter Donkor; Charles Mock Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Charles Ameh; Sia Msuya; Jan Hofman; Joanna Raven; Matthews Mathai; Nynke van den Broek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Angelo S Nyamtema; Alise Bartsch de Jong; David P Urassa; Jos van Roosmalen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Thomas van den Akker; Jogchum Beltman; Joey Leyten; Beatrice Mwagomba; Tarek Meguid; Jelle Stekelenburg; Jos van Roosmalen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240