Literature DB >> 17074322

"Ovarian age-based" stimulation of young women with diminished ovarian reserve results in excellent pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization.

Norbert Gleicher1, David Barad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pregnancy outcome can be positively affected if the ovarian stimulation in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is changed.
DESIGN: Case control study.
SETTING: Medical school-affiliated private infertility center. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two women, aged 26-35 years, with the diagnosis of DOR (study group) and 62 age-matched controls with apparently normal ovarian function (control group). INTERVENTION(S): Study group patients received a modified (ovarian age-based) stimulation with microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) and 450-600 IU of gonadotropin daily. Women in the control group received a standard "chronological age-based" stimulation with long luteal phase GnRH-a and up to 300 IU of gonadotropins (two patients in this group received an antagonist in place of an agonist). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The IVF cycle outcome parameters, including pregnancy rates (PR). RESULT(S): Women with DOR and controls did not differ significantly in patient profiles or underlying infertility conditions and received identical embryo numbers at transfer. The DOR patients demonstrated a strong trend toward lower gravidity. Peak E(2) levels were similar between groups but controls produced significantly more oocytes, a strong trend toward more embryos and significantly more cycles of cryopreservation. Both groups achieved a 47% rate of first positive pregnancy test (hCG), with controls demonstrating a 39% and DOR patients a 32% ongoing PR. CONCLUSION(S): Women with DOR, if treated with an ovarian age-based rather than chronological age-based ovarian stimulation protocols, will demonstrate surprisingly good PR with IVF in comparison to women with normal ovarian function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17074322     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder--a plea for universal definitions.

Authors:  J Cohen; N Chabbert-Buffet; E Darai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Too old for IVF: are we discriminating against older women?

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?

Authors:  John Zhang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Clomiphene Citrate Supplementation May Be More Feasible for Young Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve Compared with Standard Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yue Lin; Qianqian Chen; Jing Zhu; Yili Teng; Xuefeng Huang; Xia Chen
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Miscarriage rates after dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a case control study.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Eddy Ryan; Andrea Weghofer; Sonia Blanco-Mejia; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.