Literature DB >> 17073356

Immediate versus delayed functional loading of implants in the posterior mandible: a 2-year prospective clinical study of 12 consecutive cases.

George E Romanos1, Georg-Hubertus Nentwig.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical success of immediately loaded implants versus implants loaded in a delayed fashion in the posterior mandible. Three implants were placed distal to the canines bilaterally in the edentulous distal mandibular ridges of 12 patients. One side was randomly selected for placement of three implants (delayed loading; control sites) with a progressive thread design for submerged healing, and after 3 months the implants were exposed and loaded with provisional splinted crowns, which were replaced 6 weeks later by the definitive restorations. Three additional implants (immediately loaded; test sites), of the same size were placed in the contralateral side of the mandible. The test implants had abutments placed and were loaded immediately using the same protocol as the control implants. After a mean loading period of 25.3 months, the patients showed normal mean clinical values without significant differences (P < 0.05) for test and control implants, respectively, as follows: Plaque Index: 0.4 versus 0.8; Sulcus Bleeding Index: 0.5 versus 0.3; probing pocket depth: 1.9 mm versus 2.1 mm; width of keratinized mucosa: 2.5 mm versus 3.3 mm; Periotest value: -3.7 versus -3.2. Twenty-nine of the examined sites showed no bone loss. After 2 years of loading in the posterior mandible, test and control implants had the same prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17073356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Hassan Maghaireh; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

2.  Histochemical examination on the peri-implant bone with early occlusal loading after the immediate placement into extraction sockets.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ikeda; Tomoka Hasegawa; Tomomaya Yamamoto; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Kimimitsu Oda; Akiko Yamauchi; Atsuro Yokoyama
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants.

Authors:  G K Thapliyal; V R Pawar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-14

4.  Development of implant loading device for animal study about various loading protocol: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Yuna Cho; Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Hong-Seok Moon; Keun-Woo Lee; June-Sung Shim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  The seven-year cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Bum-Su Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Sang-Un Mun; Yang-Jin Yi; Su-Gwan Kim; Kyung-In Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

6.  Patient-reported outcomes for the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by two implants soon after implant surgery.

Authors:  Yuriko Komagamine; Manabu Kanazawa; Daisuke Sato; Maiko Iwaki; A Miyayasu; Shunsuke Minakuchi
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Updated secondary implant stability data of two dental implant systems. A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Grognard; Gino Verleye; Dimitrios Mavreas; Bart Vande-Vannet
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.