AIM: To test protracted irinotecan infusion plus a low-dose cisplatin in this Phase II trial to decrease its toxicity. METHODS: The eligibility criteria were: (1) histologically proven measurable gastric cancer; (2) performance status of 0 or 1; (3) no prior chemotherapy or completion of prior therapy at least 4 wk before enrollment; (4) adequate function of major organs; (5) no other active malignancy; and (6) written informed consent. The regimen consisted of irinotecan (60 mg/m(2)) on d 1 and 15 by 24-h infusion and cisplatin (10 mg/m(2)) on d 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, and 17. Treatment was repeated every 4 wk. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were registered between April 2000 and January 2001. The response rate for all 31 patients, 20 patients without prior chemotherapy, and 11 patients with prior chemotherapy was 52% (16/31), 60% (12/20), and 36% (4/11), respectively. The median survival time was 378 d. The median number of courses given to all patients was 2. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (35%) patients, while grade 3 to 4 diarrhea or nausea occurred in 1 (3%) and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. Fatigue was minimal as grade 1 fatigue was found only in 3 (10%) patients. Other adverse events were mild and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: This regimen showed a high level of activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.
AIM: To test protracted irinotecan infusion plus a low-dose cisplatin in this Phase II trial to decrease its toxicity. METHODS: The eligibility criteria were: (1) histologically proven measurable gastric cancer; (2) performance status of 0 or 1; (3) no prior chemotherapy or completion of prior therapy at least 4 wk before enrollment; (4) adequate function of major organs; (5) no other active malignancy; and (6) written informed consent. The regimen consisted of irinotecan (60 mg/m(2)) on d 1 and 15 by 24-h infusion and cisplatin (10 mg/m(2)) on d 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, and 17. Treatment was repeated every 4 wk. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were registered between April 2000 and January 2001. The response rate for all 31 patients, 20 patients without prior chemotherapy, and 11 patients with prior chemotherapy was 52% (16/31), 60% (12/20), and 36% (4/11), respectively. The median survival time was 378 d. The median number of courses given to all patients was 2. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (35%) patients, while grade 3 to 4 diarrhea or nausea occurred in 1 (3%) and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. Fatigue was minimal as grade 1 fatigue was found only in 3 (10%) patients. Other adverse events were mild and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: This regimen showed a high level of activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.
Authors: Jaffer A Ajani; Jackie Baker; Peter W T Pisters; Linus Ho; Paul F Mansfield; Barry W Feig; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: T Kunimoto; K Nitta; T Tanaka; N Uehara; H Baba; M Takeuchi; T Yokokura; S Sawada; T Miyasaka; M Mutai Journal: J Pharmacobiodyn Date: 1987-03
Authors: S Negoro; M Fukuoka; N Masuda; M Takada; Y Kusunoki; K Matsui; N Takifuji; S Kudoh; H Niitani; T Taguchi Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1991-08-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A J Lacave; I Izarzugaza; L M Antón Aparicio; M Valle Pereda; J M Gracia Marco; J M Buesa Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 1983-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: N K Kim; Y S Park; D S Heo; C Suh; S Y Kim; K C Park; Y K Kang; D B Shin; H T Kim; H J Kim Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860