Literature DB >> 17072579

Temporomandibular joint loading generated during bilateral static bites at molars and premolars.

Makoto Abe1, Raul U Medina-Martinez, Ken-ichi Itoh, Shoji Kohno.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the features of the loading vectors of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) generated during bilateral static bites at the molars and at the premolars, and to determine the major factors affecting the difference between the two loading vectors. We computed the subjects' estimated and theoretical minimum TMJ loadings under the two different bite conditions by applying the subjects' bite-force and electromyographic (EMG) data to a two-dimensional (2D) standard model of the jaw based on a rigid-body spring model of the TMJ. For a molar bite, (1) the estimated loading vector was not equal to its theoretical minimum; (2) the TMJ-loading/bite-force ratio, describing the proportion of TMJ loading, was relatively small, 0.477 on average; and (3) the estimated loading vector pointed in the direction of the central part of the articular disk's intermediate zone. For a premolar bite, on the other hand, (1) the estimated loading vector was nearly equal to its theoretical minimum; (2) the TMJ-loading/bite-force ratio was relatively large, 0.904 on average; and (3) the estimated loading vector pointed at the superior portion of the articular disk's intermediate zone. The differences between the TMJ-loading vectors for molar and premolar bites originated primarily from changes in the bite-point location.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072579     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0075-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  30 in total

1.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  M Beek; J H Koolstra; L J van Ruijven; T M van Eijden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Evaluation of complete denture occlusal contacts using pressure-sensitive sheets.

Authors:  T Suzuki; H Kumagai; T Watanabe; T Uchida; M Nagao
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  A numerical model of temporomandibular joint loading.

Authors:  D M Smith; K R McLachlan; W D McCall
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Mechanical capabilities of the human jaw muscles studied with a mathematical model.

Authors:  T M Van Eijden; E M Klok; W A Weijs; J H Koolstra
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  A three-dimensional investigation of temporomandibular joint loading.

Authors:  M G Faulkner; D C Hatcher; A Hay
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions.

Authors:  J F Yang; D A Winter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Relationship between the physiological cross-section of the human jaw muscles and their cross-sectional area in computer tomograms.

Authors:  W A Weijs; B Hillen
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1984

8.  Quantitative calculations of temporomandibular joint reaction forces--I. The importance of the magnitude of the jaw muscle forces.

Authors:  G S Throckmorton; L S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of temporomandibular joint loading.

Authors:  B May; S Saha; M Saltzman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape.

Authors:  W A Weijs; B Hillen
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.