Literature DB >> 17072546

Aquatic environmental effects monitoring guidance for environmental assessment practitioners.

B W Kilgour1, M G Dubé, K Hedley, C B Portt, K R Munkittrick.   

Abstract

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) defines the federal environmental assessment (EA) process for evaluating the likelihood that development projects (e.g., roads, buildings, factories) will have impacts on the environment. Environmental effects monitoring (EEM) programs for mining and pulp and paper mills under the Federal Fisheries Act, define the process that is to be used to evaluate existing effects caused by liquid effluents discharged by operating facilities. The EA process occurs before a project is approved, and involves predicting whether the project is going to cause significant environmental impacts. The EEM process occurs after a project is operational, and involves determining whether an existing project has had or is continuing to have significant impacts on the environment. Ideally, the processes are complimentary, with the EA process identifying environmental attributes considered important, and the EEM process demonstrating whether predicted or unpredicted impacts occurred. The two processes are usually done in isolation so potential synergies are lost. The point of this manuscript is to justify bridging the two processes. We use the aquatic environment as the example, and briefly describe the EEM process, aquatic environment indicators, experimental designs, and typical environmental thresholds, to illustrate how the EEM and EA processes link.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072546     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9433-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Use of fish functional traits to associate in-stream suspended sediment transport metrics with biological impairment.

Authors:  John S Schwartz; Andrew Simon; Lauren Klimetz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: lessons from the Lower Fraser River Basin, Canada.

Authors:  Stephanie Kristensen; Bram F Noble; Robert J Patrick
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Aquatic monitoring programs conducted during environmental impact assessments in Canada: preliminary assessment before and after weakened environmental regulation.

Authors:  Brynn Roach; Tony R Walker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluating the use of algal pigments to assess the biological condition of streams.

Authors:  Kathryn E Thomas; Roland I Hall; Garry J Scrimgeour
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Considering Fish as Recipients of Ecosystem Services Provides a Framework to Formally Link Baseline, Development, and Post-operational Monitoring Programs and Improve Aquatic Impact Assessments for Large Scale Developments.

Authors:  Carolyn J M Brown; R Allen Curry; Michelle A Gray; Jennifer Lento; Deborah L MacLatchy; Wendy A Monk; Scott A Pavey; André St-Hilaire; Bernhard Wegscheider; Kelly R Munkittrick
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.644

6.  An Assessment of the Spatial and Temporal Variability of Biological Responses to Municipal Wastewater Effluent in Rainbow Darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) Collected along an Urban Gradient.

Authors:  Meghan L M Fuzzen; Leslie M Bragg; Gerald R Tetreault; Paulina A Bahamonde; Rajiv N Tanna; Charles J Bennett; Mark E McMaster; Mark R Servos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.