Literature DB >> 17071958

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) with prostacyclin in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.

Enrico Fiaccadori1, Umberto Maggiore, Elisabetta Parenti, Roberto Giacosa, Edoardo Picetti, Carlo Rotelli, Dante Tagliavini, Aderville Cabassi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostacyclin is an easy-to-use and safe antihaemostatic drug for continuous renal replacement therapies (RRTs). No study has been performed so far about its use in critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) treated with sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), a hybrid modality between conventional intermittent and continuous RRTs.
METHODS: We studied 35 consecutive ICU patients with ARF, in whom data on safety and efficacy were prospectively collected in a single-centre experience over 15 months since August 2001. There were 25 males and 10 females; mean age, 72.1 (SD 11.4); mean APACHE II score at ICU admission, 24 (range 14-43); at RRT start, 27.4 (20-43); 28 patients (80%) were on mechanical ventilation and 17 (48.6%) had sepsis. SLED was performed using a conventional dialysis machine, with blood flow at 200 ml/min, bicarbonate-based ultrapure dialysate running at 100 ml/min, dialysate temperature 35 degrees C and low-flux polysulfone filters. Prostacyclin, under the form of its synthetic analogue epoprostenol, was infused at 6 ng/kg/min before the filter.
RESULTS: Out of 185 daily sessions performed (8-10 h, median 4 per patient, range 1-19), 19 (in 11 patients) were prematurely interrupted (10.3%; 95% CI: 5.4-18.6), after an average 58.5% of the prescribed treatment time (nine sessions in six patients for circuit clotting). This finding compared favourably with the experience we had at our unit using SLED with saline flushes. With the use of prostacyclin, two episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding were observed in 2/35 patients during SLED (5.7%; 95% CI: 0.7-19.2), corresponding to 1.1 episodes per 100 person-day on SLED. Therapeutic intervention for hypotension (fluids and/or vasopressor increase) was required in 45/185 (in 20 patients) of the sessions monitored (24.3%; 95% CI: 17.4-32.9); two sessions had to be interrupted because of refractory hypotension. Urea reduction ratio was 0.50 (SD 0.12); mean prescribed and obtained net ultrafiltration were 1.96 l (range 0.5-5.0) and 1.99 l (0.5-5.0), respectively. In-hospital mortality was 46%; mortality predicted by the APACHE II model at ICU admission was 42%; at SLED start, 51%.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostacyclin is a safe and effective antihaemostatic agent for SLED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071958     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfl627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of a citrate-based protocol for sustained low-efficiency dialysis in AKI using standard dialysis equipment.

Authors:  Enrico Fiaccadori; Giuseppe Regolisti; Carola Cademartiri; Aderville Cabassi; Edoardo Picetti; Maria Barbagallo; Tiziano Gherli; Giuseppe Castellano; Santo Morabito; Umberto Maggiore
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  What are the anticoagulation options for intermittent hemodialysis?

Authors:  Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Sustained low-efficiency extended dialysis (SLED) with single-pass batch system in critically-ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Authors:  Renato A Caires; Regina C R M Abdulkader; Verônica T Costa E Silva; Gillene S Ferreira; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Luis Yu; Etienne Macedo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 4.  Regional citrate anticoagulation for renal replacement therapies in patients with acute kidney injury: a position statement of the Work Group "Renal Replacement Therapies in Critically Ill Patients" of the Italian Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  Enrico Fiaccadori; Valentina Pistolesi; Filippo Mariano; Elena Mancini; Giorgio Canepari; Paola Inguaggiato; Marco Pozzato; Santo Morabito
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Management of acute renal dysfunction in sepsis.

Authors:  Federico Nalesso; Zaccaria Ricci; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Anticoagulation in patients with acute kidney injury undergoing kidney replacement therapy.

Authors:  Rupesh Raina; Ronith Chakraborty; Andrew Davenport; Patrick Brophy; Sidharth Sethi; Mignon McCulloch; Timothy Bunchman; Hui Kim Yap
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.651

Review 7.  Regional citrate anticoagulation for RRTs in critically ill patients with AKI.

Authors:  Santo Morabito; Valentina Pistolesi; Luigi Tritapepe; Enrico Fiaccadori
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) for acute lithium intoxication.

Authors:  Enrico Fiaccadori; Umberto Maggiore; Elisabetta Parenti; Paolo Greco; Aderville Cabassi
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-07-03

9.  Evaluation of Intermittent Hemodialysis in Critically Ill Cancer Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Using Single-Pass Batch Equipment.

Authors:  Verônica Torres da Costa E Silva; Elerson C Costalonga; Ana Paula Leandro Oliveira; James Hung; Renato Antunes Caires; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Julia T Fukushima; Cilene Muniz Soares; Juliana Silva Bezerra; Luciane Oikawa; Luis Yu; Emmanuel A Burdmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A novel citrate-based protocol versus heparin anticoagulation for sustained low-efficiency dialysis in the ICU: safety, efficacy, and cost.

Authors:  Ming Wen; Claudius Küchle; Dominik Steubl; Robin Satanovskji; Uwe Heemann; Yana Suttmann; Susanne Angermann; Stephan Kemmner; Lisa Rehbehn; Monika Huber; Christine Hauser; Christoph Schmaderer; Anna-Lena Reichelt; Bernhard Haller; Lutz Renders
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.