Literature DB >> 17071907

Emission of the greenhouse gases nitrous oxide and methane from constructed wetlands in europe.

A K Søvik1, J Augustin, K Heikkinen, J T Huttunen, J M Necki, S M Karjalainen, B Kløve, A Liikanen, U Mander, M Puustinen, S Teiter, P Wachniew.   

Abstract

The potential atmospheric impact of constructed wetlands (CWs) should be examined as there is a worldwide increase in the development of these systems. Fluxes of N(2)O, CH(4), and CO(2) have been measured from CWs in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Poland during winter and summer in horizontal and vertical subsurface flow (HSSF and VSSF), free surface water (FSW), and overland and groundwater flow (OGF) wetlands. The fluxes of N(2)O-N, CH(4)-C, and CO(2)-C ranged from -2.1 to 1000, -32 to 38 000, and -840 to 93 000 mg m(-2) d(-1), respectively. Emissions of N(2)O and CH(4) were significantly higher during summer than during winter. The VSSF wetlands had the highest fluxes of N(2)O during both summer and winter. Methane emissions were highest from the FSW wetlands during wintertime. In the HSSF wetlands, the emissions of N(2)O and CH(4) were in general highest in the inlet section. The vegetated ponds in the FSW wetlands released more N(2)O than the nonvegetated ponds. The global warming potential (GWP), summarizing the mean N(2)O and CH(4) emissions, ranged from 5700 to 26000 and 830 to 5100 mg CO(2) equivalents m(-2) d(-1) for the four CW types in summer and winter, respectively. The wintertime GWP was 8.5 to 89.5% of the corresponding summertime GWP, which highlights the importance of the cold season in the annual greenhouse gas release from north temperate and boreal CWs. However, due to their generally small area North European CWs were suggested to represent only a minor source for atmospheric N(2)O and CH(4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071907     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

1.  Influence of infrastructure on water quality and greenhouse gas dynamics in urban streams.

Authors:  Rose M Smith; Sujay S Kaushal; Jake J Beaulieu; Michael J Pennino; Claire Welty
Journal:  Biogeosciences       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.295

2.  Comparison of different ecological remediation methods for removing nitrate and ammonium in Qinshui River, Gonghu Bay, Taihu Lake.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Zhengkui Li; Huayang Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Review of Dry and Wet Decentralized Sanitation Technologies for Rural Areas: Applicability, Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  N Lourenço; L M Nunes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Effects of genotypic diversity of Phragmites australis on primary productivity and water quality in an experimental wetland.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomimatsu; Kazunori Nakano; Nozomi Yamamoto; Yoshihisa Suyama
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Emissions of NO and N2O in wetland microcosms for swine wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Shunan Zhang; Feng Liu; Runlin Xiao; Yong Li; Juan Zhou; Jinshui Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Comparison of carbon balance in Mediterranean pilot constructed wetlands vegetated with different C4 plant species.

Authors:  Antonio C Barbera; Maurizio Borin; Giuseppe L Cirelli; Attilio Toscano; Carmelo Maucieri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.