OBJECTIVES: To characterize the perceptual assessment of vocal quality in subglottic stenosis (SGS) patients and to identify risk factors for dysphonia. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review, academic center. METHODS: Perceptual voice assessment using GRBAS scale (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain); patient characteristics determined for 31 SGS cases. RESULTS: The mean GRBAS (0 to 3 scale, 0 = normal quality) for SGS patients at their initial visit was G(1.4)R(1.2)B(0.5)A(0.5)S(1.1). For males vs females: G(2.1 vs 1.1)R(2.0 vs 0.8)B(1.0 vs 0.4)A(1.0 vs 0.3)S(1.7 vs 0.9). The Grade (P < 0.03), Breathiness (P < 0.04), and Asthenia (P < 0.02) assessments were significantly more dysphonic in patients with multilevel stenosis; vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) also impacted overall Grade (P < 0.01). Overall Grade (P < 0.002), Roughness (P < 0.007), and Breathiness (P < 0.006) were significantly worse in patients with prior airway surgery. CONCLUSION: SGS patients demonstrate a mild to moderate change in perceptual voice characteristics with males in this series being more affected than females. Negative risk factors include multiple stenoses, VFMI, and previous airway surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first systematic report of perceptual voice assessment in subglottic stenosis. SGS patients have notable degrees of dysphonia with identifiable risk factors.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the perceptual assessment of vocal quality in subglottic stenosis (SGS) patients and to identify risk factors for dysphonia. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review, academic center. METHODS: Perceptual voice assessment using GRBAS scale (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain); patient characteristics determined for 31 SGS cases. RESULTS: The mean GRBAS (0 to 3 scale, 0 = normal quality) for SGSpatients at their initial visit was G(1.4)R(1.2)B(0.5)A(0.5)S(1.1). For males vs females: G(2.1 vs 1.1)R(2.0 vs 0.8)B(1.0 vs 0.4)A(1.0 vs 0.3)S(1.7 vs 0.9). The Grade (P < 0.03), Breathiness (P < 0.04), and Asthenia (P < 0.02) assessments were significantly more dysphonic in patients with multilevel stenosis; vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) also impacted overall Grade (P < 0.01). Overall Grade (P < 0.002), Roughness (P < 0.007), and Breathiness (P < 0.006) were significantly worse in patients with prior airway surgery. CONCLUSION:SGSpatients demonstrate a mild to moderate change in perceptual voice characteristics with males in this series being more affected than females. Negative risk factors include multiple stenoses, VFMI, and previous airway surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first systematic report of perceptual voice assessment in subglottic stenosis. SGSpatients have notable degrees of dysphonia with identifiable risk factors.
Authors: Kristine Tanner; Christopher Dromey; Mark L Berardi; Lisa M Mattei; Jenny L Pierce; Jonathan J Wisco; Eric J Hunter; Marshall E Smith Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Idris Samad; Lee Akst; Selmin Karatayli-Özgürsoy; Kristine Teets; Marissa Simpson; Ashwyn Sharma; Simon R A Best; Alexander T Hillel Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Donald T Donovan; Julina Ongkasuwan; S A R Nouraei; Guri Sandhu; Michael S Benninger; Paul C Bryson; Robert R Lorenz; William S Tierney; Alexander T Hillel; Shekhar K Gadkaree; David G Lott; Eric S Edell; Dale C Ekbom; Jan L Kasperbauer; Fabien Maldonado; Joshua S Schindler; Marshall E Smith; James J Daniero; C Gaelyn Garrett; James L Netterville; Otis B Rickman; Robert J Sinard; Christopher T Wootten; David O Francis Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Yu Shyr; Lynne Berry; Alexander T Hillel; Dale C Ekbom; Eric S Edell; Jan L Kasperbauer; David G Lott; Donald T Donovan; C Gaelyn Garrett; Guri Sandhu; James J Daniero; James L Netterville; Josh S Schindler; Marshall E Smith; Paul C Bryson; Robert R Lorenz; David O Francis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692