Literature DB >> 17071260

Subdural intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: clinical experience with the Codman MicroSensor.

Wei-Chen Hong1, Yong-Kwang Tu, Yuan-Shen Chen, Li-Ming Lien, Sheng-Jean Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our main objective was to study the clinical outcome and complications of the subdural ICP monitoring with the CMS (Johnson and Johnson Medical Ltd, Raynhan, MA) in severe head injury.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with head injury with a GCS score of 8 or less was performed. Patients with severe systemic injury with hypotension (systolic blood pressure of <90 mm Hg on admission), a GCS score of 3 with fixed and dilated pupils after resuscitation, a GCS score of 3 to 4 whose family refused aggressive treatment, and those who were dead on arrival were excluded from this study. During the period from January 1997 to April 2004, 120 patients with severe head injuries were included and met criteria for insertion of a subdural ICP monitoring device (CMS).
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (84 males and 36 females), aged 16 to 80 years old (mean, 43.8 +/- 14.4), were enrolled in the study. The average duration of ICP monitoring device use was 7.6 +/- 0.4 days (range, 2-14 days). The overall clinical outcomes of these patients were as follows: mortality rate, 13.5%; percentage of unfavorable outcomes, 17.3%; percentage of favorable outcomes, 69.2%. There were no complications such as CNS infection or hemorrhage in this study.
CONCLUSION: A subdural transducer-tipped catheter (CMS) can be used as the first-line equipment for monitoring ICP in patients with severe head injury. The clinical results are similar with other recent studies, but no complication such as infection or hemorrhage occurred in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071260     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  6 in total

1.  Baicalein exerts neuroprotective effect against ischaemic/reperfusion injury via alteration of NF-kB and LOX and AMPK/Nrf2 pathway.

Authors:  Yu Yuan; Weidong Men; Xiaosong Shan; Hexin Zhai; Xiaoxia Qiao; Lianting Geng; Chunhui Li
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review.

Authors:  P H Raboel; J Bartek; M Andresen; B M Bellander; B Romner
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 3.  Chronically implanted pressure sensors: challenges and state of the field.

Authors:  Lawrence Yu; Brian J Kim; Ellis Meng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Serial Brain CT Scans in Severe Head Injury without Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Dong-Seong Shin; Sun-Chul Hwang; Bum-Tae Kim; Je Hoon Jeong; Soo-Bin Im; Won-Han Shin
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-30

5.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in normal dogs using subdural and intraparenchymal miniature strain-gauge transducers.

Authors:  Beverly K Sturges; Peter J Dickinson; Linda D Tripp; Irina Udaltsova; Richard A LeCouteur
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A nomogram for estimating intracranial pressure using acute subdural hematoma thickness and midline shift.

Authors:  Chun-Chih Liao; Heng-Chun Liao; Feipei Lai; Furen Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.