Literature DB >> 17071018

Is extinction the hallmark of operant discrimination? Reinforcement and S(Delta) effects.

Matthew E Andrzejewski1, Curtis D Ryals, Sean Higgins, Jennifer Sulkowski, Janice Doney, Ann E Kelley, Philip J Bersh.   

Abstract

Using a successive discrimination procedure with rats, three experiments investigated the contribution of reinforcement rate and amount of S(Delta) exposure on the acquisition of an operant discrimination. S(D) components and were always 2 min in length, while S(Delta) (extinction) components were either 1 min or 4 min in length; responses in S(D) were reinforced on one of four schedules. In Experiment 1, each of eight groups were exposed to one possible combination of rate of reinforcement and S(Delta) component length. At every level of reinforcement, the 4 min S(Delta) groups acquired the discrimination more quickly. However, within each level of reinforcement, the proportions of responding in S(D) as a function cumulative S(Delta) exposure were equivalent, regardless of the number of reinforcers earned in S(D), suggesting that extinction is the "hallmark" of discrimination. Experiment 2 sought to replicate these results in a within-subjects design, and although the 4 min S(Delta) conditions always produced superior discriminations, the lack of discriminated responding in some conditions suggested that stimulus disparity was reduced. Experiment 3 clarified those results and extended the finding that the acquisition of operant discrimination closely parallels extinction of responding in S(Delta). In sum, it appears that higher reinforcement rates and longer S(Delta) exposure facilitate the acquisition of discriminated operant responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071018      PMCID: PMC2367314          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  A HABER; H I KALISH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Discrimination learning with and without "errors".

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent generalization gradients for food-controlled and shock-controlled behavior.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus control: part I.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

6.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Probability of reinforcement and the development of stimulus control.

Authors:  C O Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains.

Authors:  Glen T Prusky; K Troy Harker; Robert M Douglas; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC and nicotine from one operant response to another in rats.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi; Brian J LeMay; Torbjörn U C Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Time-scale-invariant information-theoretic contingencies in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Abigail Kalmbach; Eileen Chun; Kathleen Taylor; Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Examination of alternative-response discrimination training and resurgence in rats.

Authors:  Kaitlyn O Browning; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The effects of clinically relevant doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate on signal detection and DRL in rats.

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Robert C Spencer; Rachel L Harris; Elizabeth C Feit; Brenda L McKee; Craig W Berridge
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Adenosine A2A receptor and ERK-driven impulsivity potentiates hippocampal neuroblast proliferation.

Authors:  A Oliveros; C H Cho; A Cui; S Choi; D Lindberg; D Hinton; M-H Jang; D-S Choi
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.222

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.