Literature DB >> 17070956

Is there a business case for quality in The Netherlands? A critical analysis of the recent reforms of the health care system.

Thomas Custers1, Onyebuchi A Arah, Niek S Klazinga.   

Abstract

Major reforms of the health insurance system and reimbursement systems for care providers are currently taking place in The Netherlands. These market-oriented health care reforms will transform the current central supply-driven system to a system of managed competition both among health care insurers and care providers. The reforms are not systematically linked to the discussions about quality of care and together with consumers who might be more interested in lower premiums; they offer almost no incentive for health care insurers and providers to steer on quality. Dutch policy makers should, therefore, be more explicit whether competition should take place on quality or price, and if the former is the case, additional incentives as part of the system reforms, are needed to create a business case for quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070956     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  16 in total

1.  Effects of competition on hospital quality: an examination using hospital administrative data.

Authors:  Alfons Palangkaraya; Jongsay Yong
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-03-07

2.  Design and development of EMR supporting medical process management.

Authors:  Jing-Song Li; Xiao-Guang Zhang; Jian Chu; Muneou Suzuki; Kenji Araki
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development.

Authors:  Diana M J Delnoij; Jany J D J M Rademakers; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Pay for performance: is it the best way to improve control of hypertension?

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?

Authors:  Pashiera Barkhuysen; Wim de Grauw; Reinier Akkermans; José Donkers; Henk Schers; Marion Biermans
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Exploring the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: modelling relations between conditions, applied changes and outcomes.

Authors:  Michel L A Dückers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Cordula Wagner; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  An integrated approach to preventing cardiovascular disease: community-based approaches, health system initiatives, and public health policy.

Authors:  Tina Karwalajtys; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-09-06

8.  Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Robert Fleetcroft; Nicholas Steel; Richard Cookson; Simon Walker; Amanda Howe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Exploring improvements in patient logistics in Dutch hospitals with a survey.

Authors:  Wineke A M van Lent; E Marloes Sanders; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Why a successful task substitution in glaucoma care could not be transferred from a hospital setting to a primary care setting: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kim M Holtzer-Goor; Thomas Plochg; Hans G Lemij; Esther van Sprundel; Marc A Koopmanschap; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.