BACKGROUND: This survey assessed and compared National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Third Adult Treatment Panel lipid treatment goal achievement for men versus women undergoing treatment of dyslipidemia. METHODS: Patients receiving treatment for dyslipidemia from physicians (N = 376) in the United States who were high prescribers of lipid medications were enrolled in the NCEP Evaluation Project Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE) II. Data from a single office visit were collected and entered into the NEPTUNE software on a personal digital assistant and uploaded to a central database via the Internet. RESULTS: Of the 4885 patients evaluated, 2103 (43%) were women. NCEP Third Adult Treatment Panel low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement was similar between women and men with 0 or 1 risk factor (89% and 88%, respectively) and 2 or more risk factors (75% and 76%, respectively). However, fewer women than men achieved goal in the coronary heart disease and risk equivalents (CHD + CHD RE) category (50% vs 60%, respectively; P < .001). Logistic regression analyses examining the association between sex and LDL-C treatment goal achievement, and evaluating potential confounding by other predictors of treatment success, indicated an age-adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.77; P < .001) and a multivariate odds ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.93; P = .009) for women compared with men in the CHD + CHD RE category. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex was associated with lower likelihood of LDL-C goal achievement among patients with CHD + CHD RE. This relationship remained significant after adjustment for other significant predictors of treatment success.
BACKGROUND: This survey assessed and compared National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Third Adult Treatment Panel lipid treatment goal achievement for men versus women undergoing treatment of dyslipidemia. METHODS:Patients receiving treatment for dyslipidemia from physicians (N = 376) in the United States who were high prescribers of lipid medications were enrolled in the NCEP Evaluation Project Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE) II. Data from a single office visit were collected and entered into the NEPTUNE software on a personal digital assistant and uploaded to a central database via the Internet. RESULTS: Of the 4885 patients evaluated, 2103 (43%) were women. NCEP Third Adult Treatment Panel low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement was similar between women and men with 0 or 1 risk factor (89% and 88%, respectively) and 2 or more risk factors (75% and 76%, respectively). However, fewer women than men achieved goal in the coronary heart disease and risk equivalents (CHD + CHD RE) category (50% vs 60%, respectively; P < .001). Logistic regression analyses examining the association between sex and LDL-C treatment goal achievement, and evaluating potential confounding by other predictors of treatment success, indicated an age-adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.77; P < .001) and a multivariate odds ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.93; P = .009) for women compared with men in the CHD + CHD RE category. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex was associated with lower likelihood of LDL-C goal achievement among patients with CHD + CHD RE. This relationship remained significant after adjustment for other significant predictors of treatment success.
Authors: Annette Draeger; Verónica Sanchez-Freire; Katia Monastyrskaya; Hans Hoppeler; Matthias Mueller; Fabio Breil; Markus G Mohaupt; Eduard B Babiychuk Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Peter H Jones; Harold E Bays; Michael H Davidson; Maureen T Kelly; Susan M Buttler; Carolyn M Setze; Darryl J Sleep; James C Stolzenbach Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Fatma Al-Mahruqi; Khalid Al-Rasadi; Abdullah Shehab; Wael Al Mahmeed; Mohammed Arafah; Ali T Al-Hinai; Omer Al Tamimi; Mahmoud Al Awadhi; Raul D Santos Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.876