Literature DB >> 17070172

Aortic root dysfunctioning and its effect on left ventricular function in Ross procedure patients assessed with magnetic resonance imaging.

Heynric B Grotenhuis1, Jos J M Westenberg, Joost Doornbos, Lucia J M Kroft, Paul H Schoof, Mark G Hazekamp, Hubert W Vliegen, Jaap Ottenkamp, Albert de Roos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the diameters and distensibility of the aortic root as well as the degree of aortic regurgitation (AR) and its effect on left ventricular (LV) function in patients 8.2 +/- 3.1 years after they underwent the Ross procedure, with a comparison of these parameters between patients and matched healthy subjects.
METHODS: Eighteen Ross procedure patients (16 male patients, age [mean +/- SD] 19.2 +/- 3.8 years) and 18 matched healthy subjects (16 male patients, age [mean +/- SD] 19.7 +/- 4.2 years) underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements for diameters (at 4 levels) and the distensibility of the aortic root were performed using a steady-state free precession sequence. Aortic flow was assessed with a velocity-encoded phase-contrast sequence. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed with a gradient-echo sequence in the short-axis plane. Comparison of parameters was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations between diameters, distensibility, AR fraction, and LV systolic function were expressed with Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of LV systolic dysfunction.
RESULTS: Aortic root diameters were increased in Ross procedure patients as compared with healthy subjects (mean difference 6.3-11.6 mm, P < or = .02 at all 4 levels). Distensibility of the aortic root was lower in patients (1.9 +/- 1.1 vs 7.8 +/- 3.3 mm Hg(-1), P < .01). An AR fraction > 5% was present in 14 of the 18 patients (mean AR fraction 8% +/- 5% vs 1% +/- 1%, P < .01). Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients (50% +/- 6% vs 57% +/- 6%, P < .01). Dilatation, decreased distensibility, and AR fraction were correlated with impaired LV systolic function (P < .05 for all). The AR fraction predicted impaired LV systolic function (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging shows dilatation and decreased distensibility of the aortic root, AR, and consequent impaired LV systolic function in patients after the Ross procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070172     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Arno A W Roest; Albert de Roos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Anas Dogui; Nadjia Kachenoura; Frédérique Frouin; Muriel Lefort; Alain De Cesare; Elie Mousseaux; Alain Herment
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Pulmonary flow profile and distensibility following acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Frederikus A Klok; Soha Romeih; Jos J M Westenberg; Lucia J M Kroft; Menno V Huisman; Albert de Roos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.

Authors:  Jos J M Westenberg; Eveline P van Poelgeest; Paul Steendijk; Heynric B Grotenhuis; J W Jukema; Albert de Roos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Longitudinal and circumferential strain of the proximal aorta.

Authors:  Vanessa Bell; William A Mitchell; Sigurður Sigurðsson; Jos J M Westenberg; John D Gotal; Alyssa A Torjesen; Thor Aspelund; Lenore J Launer; Albert de Roos; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tamara B Harris; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation.

Authors:  W H S van Wijk; J M P J Breur; J J M Westenberg; M M P Driessen; F J Meijboom; B Driesen; E C de Baat; P A F M Doevendans; T Leiner; H B Grotenhuis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents--assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography.

Authors:  Thomas Kaiser; Christian J Kellenberger; Manuela Albisetti; Eva Bergsträsser; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Estimation of aortic pulse wave transit time in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using complex wavelet cross-spectrum analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Bargiotas; Elie Mousseaux; Wen-Chung Yu; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh; Emilie Bollache; Alain de Cesare; Joao A C Lima; Alban Redheuil; Nadjia Kachenoura
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Cardiovascular outcome associations among cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of arterial stiffness: the Dallas heart study.

Authors:  Christopher D Maroules; Amit Khera; Colby Ayers; Akshay Goel; Ronald M Peshock; Suhny Abbara; Kevin S King
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.