Literature DB >> 17069883

Widening the temporal window: processing support in the treatment of aphasic language production.

Marcia Linebarger1, Denise McCall, Telana Virata, Rita Sloan Berndt.   

Abstract

Investigations of language processing in aphasia have increasingly implicated performance factors such as slowed activation and/or rapid decay of linguistic information. This approach is supported by studies utilizing a communication system (SentenceShaper) which functions as a "processing prosthesis." The system may reduce the impact of processing limitations by allowing repeated refreshing of working memory and by increasing the opportunity for aphasic subjects to monitor their own speech. Some aphasic subjects are able to produce markedly more structured speech on the system than they are able to produce spontaneously, and periods of largely independent home use of SentenceShaper have been linked to treatment effects, that is, to gains in speech produced without the use of the system. The purpose of the current study was to follow up on these studies with a new group of subjects. A second goal was to determine whether repeated, unassisted elicitations of the same narratives at baseline would give rise to practice effects, which could undermine claims for the efficacy of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069883      PMCID: PMC2292108          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: further development and new data.

Authors:  E Rochon; E M Saffran; R S Berndt; M F Schwartz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Grammatical encoding in aphasia: evidence from a "processing prosthesis".

Authors:  M C Linebarger; M F Schwartz; J R Romania; S E Kohn; D L Stephens
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Prearticulatory and postarticulatory self-monitoring in Broca's aphasia.

Authors:  C C Oomen; A Postma; H H Kolk
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  On deriving the properties of agrammatic comprehension.

Authors:  L Frazier; A Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Contextual influences on narrative discourse in normal young adults.

Authors:  C A Coelho; B Z Liles; R J Duffy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1990-11

6.  Generalization from single sentence to multisentence production in severely aphasic patients.

Authors:  M Weinrich; J R Shelton; D McCall; D M Cox
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Story structure and retelling of narratives by aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults.

Authors:  C R Ernest-Baron; R H Brookshire; L E Nicholas
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-03

Review 8.  Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency.

Authors:  G Mauner; V A Fromkin; T L Cornell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.

Authors:  L E Nicholas; R H Brookshire
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

10.  Lack of error awareness in an aphasic patient with relatively preserved auditory comprehension.

Authors:  L M Maher; L J Rothi; K M Heilman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  8 in total

1.  Aphasic speech with and without SentenceShaper: Two methods for assessing informativeness.

Authors:  Ruth B Fink; Megan R Bartlett; Jennifer S Lowery; Marcia C Linebarger; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.

Authors:  Megan R Bartlett; Ruth B Fink; Myrna F Schwartz; Marcia Linebarger
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 3.  Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Guadalupe Dávila; Natalia García Casares; Antonio Gutiérrez
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Saketh Katta; Mason Paccione; Sophia Hecht; Joel Greenhouse; Brian MacWhinney; Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Technology-Based Rehabilitation to Improve Communication after Acquired Brain Injury.

Authors:  Carrie A Des Roches; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Comparison of Therapy Practice at Home and in the Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis of the Constant Therapy Platform Data Set.

Authors:  Jason Godlove; Veera Anantha; Mahendra Advani; Carrie Des Roches; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.

Authors:  Jane Marshall; Tracey Booth; Niamh Devane; Julia Galliers; Helen Greenwood; Katerina Hilari; Richard Talbot; Stephanie Wilson; Celia Woolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rehabilitation of language in expressive aphasias: a literature review.

Authors:  Denise Ren da Fontoura; Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues; Luciana Behs de Sá Carneiro; Ana Maria Monção; Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.