Literature DB >> 17069822

Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection.

Lionel J J Catalan1, Victor Liang, Charles Q Jia.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H(2)S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO(2)), methyl mercaptan (CH(3)SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS(2)), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36ppb (v/v) up to 1.5ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux-Vos detection limit (x(D)), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity (D(s)) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux-Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux-Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069822     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Emissions of reduced sulphur compounds from the surface of primary and secondary wastewater clarifiers at a Kraft Mill.

Authors:  Lionel Catalan; Victor Liang; Andrea Johnson; Charles Jia; Brian O'Connor; Chris Walton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ultratrace level determination and quantitative analysis of kidney injury biomarkers in patient samples attained by zinc oxide nanorods.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Anginelle Alabanza; Lorelis E Gonzalez; Weiwei Wang; W Brian Reeves; Jong-in Hahm
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Evaluation of single column trapping/separation and chemiluminescence detection for measurement of methanethiol and dimethyl sulfide from pig production.

Authors:  Michael Jørgen Hansen; Kei Toda; Tomoaki Obata; Anders Peter S Adamsen; Anders Feilberg
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  A survey on gas sensing technology.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Sitian Cheng; Hong Liu; Sha Hu; Daqiang Zhang; Huansheng Ning
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  An Outlook of Recent Advances in Chemiresistive Sensor-Based Electronic Nose Systems for Food Quality and Environmental Monitoring.

Authors:  Alishba T John; Krishnan Murugappan; David R Nisbet; Antonio Tricoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.