Literature DB >> 17069388

Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980-2000.

David A Kroodsma1, Christopher B Field.   

Abstract

To better understand agricultural carbon fluxes in California, USA, we estimated changes in soil carbon and woody material between 1980 and 2000 on 3.6 x 10(6) ha of farmland in California. Combining the CASA (Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach) model with data on harvest indices and yields, we calculated net primary production, woody production in orchard and vineyard crops, and soil carbon. Over the 21-yr period, two trends resulted in carbon sequestration. Yields increased an average of 20%, corresponding to greater plant biomass and more carbon returned to the soils. Also, orchards and vineyards increased in area from 0.7 x 10(6) ha to 1.0 x 10(6) ha, displacing field crops and sequestering woody carbon. Our model estimates that California's agriculture sequestered an average of 19 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1). Sequestration was lowest in non-rice annual cropland, which sequestered 9 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1) of soil carbon, and highest on land that switched from annual cropland to perennial cropland. Land that switched from annual crops to vineyards sequestered 68 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1), and land that switched from annual crops to orchards sequestered 85 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1). Rice fields, because of a reduction in field burning, sequestered 55 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1) in the 1990s. Over the 21 years, California's 3.6 x 10(6) ha of agricultural land sequestered 11.0 Tg C within soils and 3.5 Tg C in woody biomass, for a total of 14.5 Tg C statewide. This is equal to 0.7% of the state's total fossil fuel emissions over the same time period. If California's agriculture adopted conservation tillage, changed management of almond and walnut prunings, and used all of its orchard and vineyard waste wood in the biomass power plants in the state, California's agriculture could offset up to 1.6% of the fossil fuel emissions in the state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069388     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1975:csica]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Transformations, transport, and potential unintended consequences of high sulfur inputs to Napa Valley vineyards.

Authors:  Eve-Lyn S Hinckley; Pamela A Matson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  From berries to blocks: carbon stock quantification of a California vineyard.

Authors:  Jorge Andres Morandé; Christine M Stockert; Garrett C Liles; John N Williams; David R Smart; Joshua H Viers
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2017-02-16

3.  Mediterranean California's water use future under multiple scenarios of developed and agricultural land use change.

Authors:  Tamara S Wilson; Benjamin M Sleeter; D Richard Cameron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Carbon Storage Distribution Characteristics of Vineyard Ecosystems in Hongsibu, Ningxia.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Tingting Xue; Feifei Gao; Ruteng Wei; Zhilei Wang; Hua Li; Hua Wang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.